Home » Blogs » Tales of Manic Depression » The DSM-5 Controversy – Who is the best source of information?

The DSM-5 Controversy – Who is the best source of information?

width="180"A recent article published on Yahoo Health has caused some major controversy in the mental health field.  The article titled, “DSM-5: Will Millions More Americans be Diagnosed with Mental Illness?” discusses, in a nutshell, the following:

The impending publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) has kindled fiery debate about whether Americans are being vastly over-diagnosed with mental illness or if Americans are psychologically sicker than they used to be.

The new “bible” of psychiatric diagnoses, which will be released later this month, includes new disorders relating to grief, childhood temper tantrums, binge eating, PMS, and painful sex (now called genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder), among others. It has also changed how existing conditions—including oft-polarizing ADHD and autism—are diagnosed.

According to the new definitions the DSM-5 uses, some experts predict about 50 percent of U.S. citizens could be diagnosed as “mentally ill” at some point during their lifetime.

Experts and organizations have given their two cents on the whole thing, but I am interested in the viewpoints and stories of people who have actually grabbled with their mental illness. When I published my tell all book, “Inside the Insane” about treatment of the mentally ill in LA County hospitals, a lot of people were not happy with my insight, and said I wasn’t a “clinician” so my views were not valid. Ah, no.  Try living with a disease and experiencing it firsthand.  You can’t get that insight out of a textbook ok.

So, as a woman that was diagnosed with Bipolar II eight years ago, and has been through the turmoil of understanding and treating my disease effectively, my question is: Is mental illness finally being more thoroughly researched and discovered?  Or, are we using “mental illness” as a reason to pop more pills for non-neurological problems going on?

Like I said, I tend to be more interested in those who have actually been through their own personal journey of mental illness.  Let’s hear from those that are in the trenches, they know what’s up more so than most.

The full article is here:

DSM-5 image courtesy of American Psychiatric Association.

The DSM-5 Controversy – Who is the best source of information?

Erica Loberg

Erica Loberg was born and raised in Los Angeles, CA. She attended Columbia University in New York and graduated with a BA in English. She is a published poet and author of Inside the Insane, Screaming at the Void, What Men Should Know About Women, What Women Should Know About Men, Diamonds From The Rough , Undressed, and I'm Not Playing.

2 comments: View Comments / Leave a Comment



APA Reference
Loberg, E. (2013). The DSM-5 Controversy – Who is the best source of information?. Psych Central. Retrieved on June 5, 2020, from


Last updated: 16 May 2013
Statement of review: Psych Central does not review the content that appears in our blog network ( prior to publication. All opinions expressed herein are exclusively those of the author alone, and do not reflect the views of the editorial staff or management of Psych Central. Published on All rights reserved.