Home » Blogs » ADHD Man of Distraction » Required Negative Impact Of ADHD

Required Negative Impact Of ADHD

diagnosed yet?
It might help …

There are criteria for diagnosis of ADHD.

And they keep changing.

Why? I don’t know specifics, but mostly because we keep learning things.

But there may be some influences on the changing criteria that one could only call political.

For instance …

One cannot be diagnosed with ADHD if there is no indication of childhood affliction.

What indicates childhood affliction? History and verification by family members.

But there’s a problem

There are people who deny the existence of ADHD in their family. And history is very much subjective. If you don’t believe in ADHD’s existence, you will not see it in your child.

I’ve had people tell me that doctors have tried to diagnose their children with ADHD but they wouldn’t let them because their children are too smart to have ADHD.

(Forget about my heartfelt reactive speech on how their child could be the smartest person in the world and still have a parent foolish enough to deny them the advantages that a diagnosis and the understanding of their mind and its workings)

So …

No history, no diagnosis! No diagnosis, no assistance in coping.

But hey, that’s just one person, right? Or is it?

The bigger picture

Since ADHD is a genetically transmitted issue, subsequent generations are starting out with less help than they might have.

Additionally, siblings, aunts and uncles, maybe even cousins might benefit from finding out about the existence of a condition they never previously considered.

But it’s just history, right?

Nope. There is an additional criteria before a diagnosis can be made.

In addition to symptoms, there must be a negative impact on ones life. On the CHADD website we can read, “If the individual exhibits a number of ADHD symptoms but they do not cause significant impairment, s/he may not meet the criteria to be diagnosed with ADHD as a clinical disorder.”

How is significant impairment determined?

Yes!!! Great question!

If you have all the symptoms, but you also have people looking after every aspect of your life that might be negatively impacted by ADHD, do you then not have ADHD?

How does that work?

If you can’t see, but have a job and a life where everything you need to be aware of is communicated to you verbally, does that mean you aren’t blind? No negative impact, no issue.

Okay …

Yeah, that’s a stretch, but you see what I mean, right?

You have the symptoms and you have the history, but you’ve managed, possibly with the help of friends and family, to learn to cope, so you don’t really have ADHD?

I think …

The criteria should consider the genetic issue.

If I have the ability to pass on the genetic potential for ADHD than I should be diagnosed, if not as someone with ADHD, than at the very least as a carrier.

Does that seem a little silly?

No sillier than the idea that life impact of specific symptoms and history should be part of a diagnosis of a valid medical issue.

That aspect of diagnosis alone is fuel for the fires of those who deny the existence of this disorder.

If we aren’t taking it any more seriously than this, how do we expect others to?

Required Negative Impact Of ADHD

Kelly Babcock

I was born in the city of Toronto in 1959, but moved when I was in my fourth year of life. I was raised and educated in a rural setting, growing up in a manner I like to refer to as free range. I live in an area where my family history stretches back 6 or more generations. I was diagnosed with ADHD at the age of 50 and have been both struggling with the new reality and using my discoveries to make my life better. I write two blogs here at Psych Central, one about having ADHD and one that is a daily positive affirmation that acts as an example of finding the good in as much of my life as I possibly can.

Find out more about me on my website: writeofway.

email me at ADHD Man

No comments yet... View Comments / Leave a Comment



APA Reference
Babcock, K. (2019). Required Negative Impact Of ADHD. Psych Central. Retrieved on August 21, 2019, from


Last updated: 16 Jan 2019
Statement of review: Psych Central does not review the content that appears in our blog network ( prior to publication. All opinions expressed herein are exclusively those of the author alone, and do not reflect the views of the editorial staff or management of Psych Central. Published on All rights reserved.