When the “Twilight” book phenomenon took off a few years ago I stayed as far away from it as possible. As a 30-something, I wasn’t going to deign myself to read what had become a teen-craze book. We’ve all seen those sad images of 30 and 40+ women who go gaga over fictitious love stories because they don’t have “love” in their own lives. Saw one on the subway the other day with a “Twilight Convention” tote bag! I didn’t want to get anywhere near that group …
Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines. The comments below begin with the oldest comments first. Click on the last comments page to jump to the most recent comments.
I agree with you about the Twilight series, though I’ve only seen the first two movies and doubt I’ll go further. In the first, I could easily understand how teenaged girls would be drawn to the idea of a boy who aches to devour his lover, blood and soul. It’s obviously highly erotic, and I say that as a middle-aged man who views sex from a very different perspective than an adolescent girl. The enforced chaste separation between the two simply highlighted the sensuality. But in the second movie the girl basically gives up on life because her boyfriend moved away. She becomes self-destructive and disengaged. In addition to the points you make, that alone is a terrible message to send to young girls. It’s a throwback to the days when women were defined by their husbands and little more. Until I read your post I didn’t know about the author’s Mormon connection, but now I see it explains a lot.
now you should definitely read ‘the host,’ too. it is also informed by the author’s faith, but in a much more subtle way.
i honestly don’t think most people, even mormons, really notice.
Before posting, please read our blog moderation guidelines.
Post a Comment: