Therapy Unplugged

So you’ve been in session several times now and you really click with your therapist. He/she is warm, sensitive, caring and empathic and everything you’ve ever wanted in a friend. During the weeks between sessions you start to fantasise about sharing a coffee, walking along the beach, going horse-riding, having dinner with them, going shopping with them or just generally shooting the breeze over a glass of wine or two.

This is not transference talking, this is the here and now of the therapeutic relationship. What is happening is in the present, not the past and you don’t quite understand it when your therapist tells you that a friendship is not a good idea and will never happen but still you persist because you feel connected and think you both have so much in common.

This is not a rare fantasy for clients. When it is well boundaried it can be a positive healing experience to explore the imagination of a friendship with all its fun and creativity, and this is great – as long as it never happens.

Here are five good reasons why it’s not a good idea to become friends with your therapist.

1. The extreme power differential.

He/she knows way more about you than the average person would be comfortable with and it’s a one way street, extremely tipped over in terms of disclosure. Therapy is not a mutual sharing of intimate secrets. I would be appalled if my therapist flapped her dirty laundry in my direction. I pay her to be the keeper of my secrets. If I were with her in public I would feel naked and vulnerable and I doubt I would ever feel equal to her which of course is the foundation of an egalitarian relationship.

2. Neediness, greediness and jealousy.

If, in the very unlikely possibility my therapist and I became equal friends, it would rapidly become unbalanced because I would become very possessive and jealous in a short space of time. I don’t think I could bear to see her talk intimately with anyone else. That is why it’s a fantastic idea to keep our relationship a business one with many boundaries on both sides. Envy and resentment do not work well in any friendship.

3. It’s not about the therapist.

Do you have friends who are warm and positive or do you have issues with people you have known for a long time? Perhaps your obsessive desire to be friends with your therapist stems back to your childhood and adolescence? Or else it has more to do with your current situation than you realise? Did you/do you have satisfying relationships at school, university, your leisure pursuits or your work environment? If you don’t perhaps this could be explored within therapy to open up to insight and enlightenment about yourself. If you do have satisfying relationships with people outside therapy then perhaps exploring deeper issues to do with your childhood and parents may be more appropriate.

Not knowing much about a caring, sensitive person you are in a therapeutic relationship with makes them far more desirable than that person at the local bridge club/tennis club/work situation who has revealed some of their flaws, warts or troubled relationships to you. It’s easy to envision the perfect friendship with the perfect person in a perfect world when you are sealed within the four walls of perfect undivided attention.

4. The ethics of post-therapy friendship.

It is universally unethical and heavily frowned upon to have a post-therapy relationship with a client in any capacity, be it friendship, financially or business based and especially if it is a sexual one. There is the potential for exploitation of the vulnerable. It says more about the therapist than the client when this happens. Most times it will end in disaster and there is plenty of anecdotal evidence on the internet to attest for this.

5. The therapist doesn’t want to be friends with you.

This is perhaps stating the bleeding obvious. Most professional therapists have spent many years obtaining the qualifications to practice in the art of helping people – for a fee and it would be unethical for them to obtain their friendship needs from their current crop of clients. One can be struck off the register if one is deemed to have had an inappropriate relationship with a client. Luckily, most of the time they have their own friends they are happy and comfortable with. It is scary stuff for them to have a client who will not take no for an answer. My view is, if you are in a therapeutic relationship with a therapist and they offer you an invitation to join their bookclub, run straight through the door, jump in your car and whatever you do, never, ever EVER look back over your shoulder.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I am an LMFT. I agree with the points on this article. However, I think it is important to understand that not all dual-role relationships are unethical. It is important to understand that the rigidity this article suggests isn’t anymore healthy than the therapist-client relationship it describes.

I would be interested to hear what dual-role relationships are ethical.

Thanks Sonia, I really appreciate this article. You make your points very clearly.

I am a social worker in training so this is also relevant to me as a professional in one of the helping professions in terms of reminding me why I should always maintain professional boundries with clients.

If people do want find friends they can discuss issues with, they should use the community here at Psych Central.

sonia, from your blog, it often sounds like you have major unresolved transference issues. and in this article in particular, it looks as if you are projecting your own particular issues onto all therapy clients.

“in the very unlikely possibility my therapist and I became equal friends, it would rapidly become unbalanced because I would become very possessive and jealous in a short space of time.”

“your obsessive desire to be friends with your therapist”

Do you mean “your OWN obsessive desire”? Not all clients are this extreme about their therapists. In fact, most probably are not.

This is not to argue for dual relationships. It’s just to say that this post seems like it’s about you and your feelings, which means it’s merely anecdotal. Interesting, but hardly conclusive.

As a general rule, the various psychological and social work organizations have no official strictures on post-therapy friendships, but frown on any sexual relationships between former therapists/clients. At best, they mandate a waiting period of two years before any sexual relationship happens.

For some interesting empirical research on all this, see:

http://kspope.com/ethics/research4.php

Here’s the abstract:

“Abstract:There is an absence of comprehensive, systematically gathered data concerning psychologists’ beliefs about and compliance with ethical principles, and we know little about which resources are valued as effective in guiding appropriate behavior. A national sample of psychologists provided data regarding the degree to which they engaged in each of 83 behaviors and the degree to which they considered each behavior to be ethical. Examples of the 83 behaviors are: treating homosexuality per se as pathological; accepting a client’s decision to commit suicide; discussing clients (without names) with friends; engaging in sexual fantasies about a client; going into business with a client; breaking confidentiality if a client is suicidal; charging a client no fee; making a custody evaluation without seeing both parents; hugging a client; signing for hours a supervisee has not earned; filing an ethics complaint against a colleague; performing forensic work for a contingency fee; altering a diagnosis to meet insurance criteria; breaking confidentiality to report child abuse; inviting clients to a party or social event; accepting goods as payment; seeing a minor client without parental consent; telling a client “I’m sexually attracted to you”; terminating therapy if a client cannot pay; asking favors from clients; using a law suit to collect fees; lending money to a client; becoming sexually involved with a former client; and engaging in sex with clinical supervisees. Twelve of the behaviors were very difficult for participants to evaluate on the basis of ethics. Seven of the 83 behaviors were practiced by over 90% of the participants; 16 by fewer than 10%. Colleagues, the APA Ethical Principles, and internship training were rated as the most helpful resources in guiding behavior; state and federal laws, published research, and local ethics committees were rated least helpful.”

The upshot on the friendship front? Less than half of all therapists who responded to the survey said that they NEVER became friends with a former client.

Great post! I love this article and agree with all the points you made! You have such a way with words and I love all your blog posts! I am happy to see you are posting regularly again after what seemed like a little hiatus from the blog world!

Thanks Caitlin, Two University exams at the end of last year plus working full-time and I just didn’t have time for anything else.

I agree very much with your assessment of what is appropriate within a patient-therapist relationship. There should be very clear boundaries that are not to be breached. Fortunately, what occurs inside the therapist’s office is a genuine human relationship–not a friendship of equals but something genuine nonetheless–very nurturing, very powerful. Ordinary friendships pale by comparison. When I have coffee or a beer with a friend, I usually feel depleted and empty afterwards because nothing much has happened. No one has listened to me. No one has offered support or guidance. Therapy is far different.

I’d like to hear from people who have had therapy and then ended up friends with their therapist and whether it worked or not.

It would be most interesting to hear from therapists (please state what type of therapist you are and if possible your qualifications) as well as from clients.

I’d also like to know what type of therapy was conducted (CBT, supportive psychotherapy, transference-based-therapy, Gestalt etc).

This is a most interesting debate/discussion.

Sonia, I generally agree with and like what you write in your articles , but this one is a bit overdone. The tone is highly emotional. Patients usually talk like that, not therapists.
I would not be appalled if my therapist would flapped his/her dirty laundry in my direction, once the therapy is over. It is very naive to expect that therapist’s life is any more simplified, compared to my own. I think every therapy, every situation, every therapist and every client are so different, it would be silly to place everyone on one shelf. Let say I know about some major warts of my own therapist, it alone does not make him any less interesting as a person or valuable as a professional, as long as he stays professional during my therapy. Subject of confidentiality is also questionable in post therapy friendship. I don’t see why a friendship would change anything?
I was not even sure what was so disjointing about your post, until I went through it again – sometimes you write from a patient prospective, sometimes from a perspective of a therapist. Seems like you wanted to deliver a reasonable message, but only left a reader with an impression of someone or something terribly ungrounded.
Now I wonder if you write this articles for a fee or get somehow otherwise compensated.

I think there is a non-verbal intimacy and understanding in the therapy room that is reciprocal in nature. Therapy was about my personal journey, but he shared in that experience. I understand that I can’t ever be friends with my former therapist, but he will always feel like a friend in my heart. I might take some heat for writing that, but I can’t control my feelings in this. He’s in my heart and he’s there to stay. It works positively for me. I’ve been out of therapy for over a year and am doing great. I’m seriously considering going back to school to study in this field. Very positive for me.

I think this may be able to work for some people, but it would likely be very challenging.

I liked the post overall. I do find myself questioning one premise that pops up quite a bit on this site — that of the power imbalance between client and therapist. I agree there can be one, but why is it assumed that it’s always the therapist who has greater power? Anecdotal evidence (FWIW): my current therapist is talented and overall I think he’s worthwhile, but he has a few blind spots and it’s not impossible that one of these could be a deal breaker. I think of him as my employee, in a way. If he’s not giving me what I want in a way that’s courteous and empathic, I’m ready to toss him out on his ear and find someone else. I just don’t buy it that he has all the power. I definitely have quite a bit. I’m not a zombie in a trance. I see him with clear eyes. Why are you telling me I’m somehow one down because I’m the client?

wow, good work on your article!

That’s ok Sonia! I am just glad you are back! I hope you aced your exams!

I agree that being friends with your therapist is terribly inappropriate. Anyone watch the show in treatment? (I know it’s just a show) but long story short…the therapist became friends with a former patient and it came back to bite him in the ass. I think it’s just a bad idea and what happens in that room should stay there (with the exception of the patients new found knowledge and skills). I can see how it could at times feel like a friendship. My therapist laughs at my jokes and cynicism all the time (I have the ability to be very funny)…and he also makes funny statements and jokes. It’s just the way it is. But at the end of the day I know that our relationship will never leave his office…it’s just the way it is.

I took advantage of the link posted above by TPG, and read the entire reseach findings on client / therapist ethics. I found it tremendously interesting, and also helped so much to relieve my sense of being wrong in wanting a post- theraputic freindship with my fabulous therapist. Thank you TPG, wherever you are ! I am a client, and not a clinician. I have been in therapy , intensely for 4 years and prior to that, intermittently for 7 to consult on issues regarding my daughter. I adore my therapist, and she knows that. I long to have a post- therapy freindship with her, and she knows that too. It will never happen, she has made that exceedingly and painfully clear. This causes me much sadness and frustration. I never will really understand why this subject is so taboo, and i appreciate Sonia posting on it, with such humor , insight and personal transparency. Anyone who blogs is brave in my eyes. However, I need to say that if you look at the findings in the APA research, 54 % of therapists polled said that post therapeutic friendships occurred in their practice ” rarely” or ” sometimes”, this is in contrast to only 45 % who said ” never”. So clearly this is a practice that does in fact occur with some regularity. And so if that is the case, why is it that this always seems to carry such a shroud of ” oh that is so wrong , bad, inappropriate…..” Could over 500 therapists ( the sampling was 1000 therapists ) be so terribly stepping outside the bounds of ethics? I have given up trying to change my therapist’s mind, she is quite settled into her very firm boundaries. But I would love to hear from clinicians who have in fact gone that route and are willing to shed light on it, by talking openly about it from ” the other side of the couch”.

Ani, thanks for the nod to me for posting the link to Kenneth Pope’s research. He is a highly respected researcher and clinician, and it’s always far better to deal with solid and replicable survey data where statistical significance can be established at a .05 or .01 confidence level, in contrast to anecdotal reporting.

Pope is pretty much unimpeachable. He’s published or co-published over 100 articles in peer-reviewed journals.

I think one of the things that’s daunting for therapy clients with therapists who just might become friends wirh a client post-therapy is that the therapist might not want to be friends with them, particularly. It would be hard not to feel rejected, and it might make the therapy iatrogenic, if your therapist became friends with Client X but not with you.

I

I like how my therapist listens to ME, sees MY viewpoint, seeks to make ME more comfortable being who I am and pays attention to everything I say and show her about MY life.I would love to have friends who did that, but that isn’t friendship,that is MY therapy and self expression to the max. If I were friends with my fabulous therapist, I would need to listen to HER struggles and focus at times on HER inadequacies instead of ME. If I truly knew her personally, I probably wouldn’t like her as much because I’d see her as I see everyone else – self focused. As I learn how to be more of ME in therapy, I am a better friend to others outside of the ME focused world of therapy.

Have had a long therapy relationship and here’s the thing. The therapist is your friend– you are not the therapist’s friend. You have never been the therapist’s friend or you would have an equal share in solving his/her problems. That will never happen because therapy can’t take place if the therapist is of much importance. It can only occur if the client is of central importance. That doesn’t mean you might not hear the occasional disclosure, but you’re unlikely to hear much because that would harm the therapeutic relationship. I do think the initial post suggests serious transference, but then so does longing to be the therapist’s friend. It suggests they still have something you are projecting onto them, and that issue needs to resolved. That you might always deeply regard or esteem a therapist or former therapist is understandable, but if people are longing and wishing for that friendship, something else is going on psychologically.

When my personal needs are not being met, I find I must be careful when counseling because it is easy to see the respect and adoration from people as a solution to my own unmet needs. Bottom line is therapists must realize they can do the transference to their clients…….Scary thought, eh?

I have been a client.
I am married to a PsyD/MFT (male)
I am social friends with about 13 therapists due to my husband’s profession. Here’s what I know in a nutshell.
Husband is happy to have a separate life and walk out the door and leave his work behind as much as he can. It’s emotionally rewarding AND draining. Yes, he will sometimes tell me about a case, but it’s always “a teen boy” or something like that.
It’s enough to come home and deal with our own lives, and those of family and friends.
Most therapist friends (PhDs, MFTs, LCSW) would not be friends with current or ex clients. There are a couple of people who would. Ironically, these are the friends who we know have broken confidentiality, etc. As a whole, nobody likes that and there are trust issues within the therapist friends group. The fact that my husband is known made it problematic for me to find an “anonymous” therapist, because I didn’t want my problems to come with preconcieved knowledge of us. I was worried about confidentiality, “just in case”. I did find a great therapist, and had confidence in her and her ethical boundaries. I found her because her excellent reputation preceeded her, and professional behavior was part of my criteria.

By not adhering to the “rules” of being a therapist, i.e. no dual relationships (that means therapist AND friend) or any other boundary problem, creates ethical, emotional and legal liability. If all does not go well, you can be sued and lose your license to practice. My husband carries a 7 figure insurance policy by law. If the client decides to write a complaint letter to the board, there is an excruciating hearing, and if your license is revoked, it appears in the therapist journal and you cannot practice as a licensed professional. There is usually a lawsuit. We know two therapists who had this experience due to “friendships”. How HUMILIATING! You risk everything you have trained and worked for, for that client friendship (or relationship).

Even though I also wished to be friends with my former therapist, (and that never really goes away, yes the relationship is one sided – all about me), I understand why it’s not wise, and knowing what I know, I feel much safer with a therapist OR therapist FRIEND who maintains strong ethical boundaries. I also respect ANY professional who carries out their business to a high professional standard; plumber, lawyer, babysitter – anyone!

I’m of the belief that transference is pretty much everywhere, in every relationship and even in everyday casual interactions. This stuff is all over the place. I still hate to think of my very best potential (which is what I discovered in my feelings for my former therapist) as something which needs to be “resolved”. I can’t give it to him, but I can give it to others. It’s something which I value greatly and always will. I always knew where the relationship had to stay, but I think considering something such as friendship in fantasy is very human. Maybe we shouldn’t beat ourselves up so much for having human desires. The important thing is respecting the boundaries and understanding that the relationship is what it is. It can still be quite a beautiful thing just as it is.

To repeat, for sake of California and others…

a. Dual relationships while there is an ongoing therapist/client relationship ranges from boundary crossing to boundary violating. Caution and mindfulness is needed.

b. There is no professional ethical prohibition against POST-therapy friendships (as opposed to sexual relationships, which have a different standard) between former therapist and former client.

Re “a” above, please note that all boundary crossings are not automatically boundary violations. For example, joining a bulemic or anorectic client for a meal in public would be a crossing, but not a violation, and might well be therapeutic. For more on this, see:

http://www.zurinstitute.com/boundariesintherapy.html

@m re: “sonia, from your blog, it often sounds like you have major unresolved transference issues. and in this article in particular, it looks as if you are projecting your own particular issues onto all therapy clients.”

I really have to take issue with the phrase “major transference issues.” I wish people would think about the meaning of the words they use.

Have you ever considered the phrase “near miss”? “Those planes had a ‘near miss,’ it could have been a disaster.”

I think what you mean is, “near hit.” Plans have near and far misses 99% of the time. It’s when they nearly hit that we should be concerned.

That’s the problem I have with “major transference issues.” When you examine the words, they don’t mean what you I think you intend to say.

“Major” connotes a serious problem, as if the person who has a major problem is somehow unable to carry out the requirements of being a therapist.

Saying someone has a major problem in their perspective about their work is practically accusing them of being incompetent. It is a word that should be reserved for an accusation, or not used at all.

Imagine your boss arriving at your work area declaring, “@m? You have a major problem.” You’re not expecting a raise after that remark, are you? “Major” is a loaded word. Keep it in reserve for serious, career-threatening problems.

“Unresolved” implies that the conflict can — and should — be resolved. Sometimes unrequited passion remains that way — unresolved. In the case of unmet needs, they may forever remain unmet.

The needs can be conscious, acknowledged, in control and contained. Nevertheless, they exist. They are a fact. Not only do they do not decrease competence, they increase an understanding of others who also have unmet needs.

“Transference” continues to be a word that makes no sense. I know we’re using it for convenience, but in reply to @m, becoming attached to a therapist is not necessarily transference.

Transference is when you project a relationship with one person onto your experience with another. The relationship occurring between two people in therapy can include transference. That transference might be worth examining.

However, the passionate attachment a client might develop to a therapist is not a projection. It’s a real-time human response to a current relationship.

Because I relate so utterly with Sonia’s experiences I take it personally when I read that she has a major transference problem.

If you don’t have the abandonment or attachment issues she describes than you are not the subject of her blog posts.

What she describes is only true for some of us. That doesn’t mean she’s projecting her issues onto all possible therapeutic subjects. That means she understands abandonment and attachment well enough to describe them.

She might not be describing you, but she’s certainly accurate in describing some of us. It would be absurd to expect any post to describe everyone.

@donald – beautifully said! You perfectly describe why the therapeutic relationship fosters attachment.

I certainly wish my “friends” treated me with focus, eye contact, concern and the ability not to mix my problems with their personal experiences.

It’d be nice — awesome — if my friends tried to be like my therapist. I give people that kind of attention all the time, but it’s rarely returned. Instead, I often feel awash in a world of narcisstic ADD. And that, as you say, is draining.

@poo – “I was not even sure what was so disjointing about your post, until I went through it again – sometimes you write from a patient prospective, sometimes from a perspective of a therapist.”

Precisely. No one is one thing. Every adult was once a child. One can only hope that every therapist was once a client. A therapist having a client’s perspective is is not a flaw; it’s an asset.

Therapists are going to have their own issues. I’m thrilled that as Sonia becomes a therapist she doesn’t forget what it’s like to to be a client.

My otherwise helpful therapist interpreted my attachment to her as a threatening sexual situation. She couldn’t discuss it with me. It looked like homophobia, but you know what it was? American Puritan Catholic training. She didn’t acknowledge her fears and shame. She pushed me into the Transference Closet.

My only hope was to travel the wilderness of Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Kenneth Pope was helpful, but only to a degree. You won’t find the phrase “urge to merge” in his works.

One excellent book about therapy is In Session, but it’s just a great description of therapy, not of what to do with the unrequited passion that a client can develop for a therapist.

Several authors made it worse. Two suggested that therapy should be open to exploring love in the name of helping clients. Let your unmet needs duke it out with that suggestion.

So Sonia’s ability to describe both the client’s and therapist’s experience of attachment has been a tremendous help to me in my relationship with my therapist. When you give her a hard time for expressing herself as a client, you’re asking her to stop writing about my experience as a client.

You guys who have a problem with Sonia’s attachment to her therapist have two choices. You can have a world in which therapists acknowledge their needy, dark, shamed, painful and crazy sides, or one in which therapists have needy, dark, shamed, painful and crazy sides, but won’t admit it.

For a really terrific and controversial article about the nature of the relationship that can develop in therapy, and what is conventionally termed “transference,” see…

“A Countertheory of Tranference,” by the renowned therapist John Shlein, written when he was on faculty at Harvard.

Here’s the lede:

“‘Transference’ is a fiction, invented and maintained by the therapist to protect himself from the consequences of his own behavior.”

http://www.allanturner.co.uk/papers/counter.htm

psychreader, my point was – both therapist and a client sounding a bit hysterical regarding transference issue. In any case, as a client, I would wanted to know about level of mental stability my psychologist possess. 14 years of therapy by a therapist is highly questionable.

psychreader: “Transference is when you project a relationship with one person onto your experience with another.”

I think it’s WAY more complicated than that. I have so many amateur theories on this (emphasizing the word “amateur”). I don’t believe that we store a specific love for our parents that belongs to only our parents. I do think that the way we love and interact within any relationship is likely based on our first relationships. I think that we have memories of our experiences during these early relationships. We remember our feelings. We remember our responses. We remember their responses to us. We then come to expect history to repeat itself and thus respond accordingly in the here and now. Something happens in the here and now which triggers a memory and then a response. All done unconsciously, of course…

I don’t think the love I have felt for my former therapist is the love I felt for my mother or father. It is instead MY love and the way I want to love. The love comes from within me, is a blueprint of me, is everything that I’m about, what is important to me, what I desire in a relationship… It’s true that my patterns are there. But these patterns are pieces of my puzzle that played out in our therapeutic relationship. Transference? Yes. But I don’t see it as minimizing. It’s just me. Also, I think that when looking at our other relationships, we’re bound to find a lot of transferences within those as well. The idea is to understand what it all means and what is says about you. I find it extremely fascinating.

@poo – “14 years of therapy by a therapist is highly questionable.”

I’m sorry my friend but that is completely backwards.

The worst therapists are going to be closed-minded about the never-ending quest to know oneself.

Therapists are human. They’re carrying around the same crazy crap that you and I are carrying around. The ones who acknowledge this and work on it are safer and more stable than those who deny it and assume their own perfection.

Stability happens when the therapist responds in human ways to clients and then acknowledges and examines the affect the client has on the therapist.

Stability can’t happen when the therapist doesn’t admit her own frailties. That’s not stability. That’s holding your breath and acting like a totem pole.

@poo – p.s. Do you think my therapist would have responded so defensively to my attraction to her if she were actively seeking support in examining her defenses?

It was not until I pulled her by the figurative hair — kicking and screaming that she was not defensive — that she finally realized that she was denying my reality to protect herself from the topic.

But for me to get through her defensiveness while in the midst of my own was damned painful.

If she were examining herself in her own therapy she would have had the opportunity to acknowledge and respond to her response.

NOW she’s getting supervision. If she had been in her own therapy when this came up I wouldn’t have had to do all the work.

(Yes she’s a good therapist and yes she’s worth it.)

@beth -

“psychreader: ‘Transference is when you project a relationship with one person onto your experience with another.’

I think it’s WAY more complicated than that.”

So do I.

The problem is we’re using one word to mean two things.

I would prefer that we use “transference” to mean projecting the past onto the present.

We need a different word for “this person is having a profound affect on me, I would like to be in their presence as much as possible.”

I think there always needs to be an adjective in front of the word “transference”. eg, idealising, positive, negative, envy, love, hate, rejecting and role-model – to list a few, but it is pretty much endless.

There are as many different types of transferences as there are styles of therapy. Sometimes I can feel all of them in one session :)

My therapist and I are having a personal relationship (now called “multiple” relationship)….it happens. As for the power differential……there are power differentials in lots of relationships, teachers, attorneys, bosses, etc…….

P.S. Transference is just a fancy word for…feelings….unless it is the classic transference (therapist reminds you of someone else, and you react to the t as you would to that person in the past.)…..Transference is present in ALL relationships.

“The only place that love is called by another name….is the therapist’s office.”

I AM friends with my therapist. I told him that if I didn’t feel we were friends, I wouldn’t be there.

I wouldn’t be able to unload this awful stuff if I didn’t love him just a little…but we talk about it and it’s cool.

What I also meant to say was that I appreciate someone articulating so clearly why I can’t ever be friends with my therapist even after therapy is over. It is a very special, carefully defined relationship that works so well, at least in part, because of these boundaries. That being said, do I ever wish I could hang out with him and his wife over nachos and beer? Sure, but given the limits of our relationship, it ain’t ever gonna happen.
In the meantime I am grateful for the person who is consistently there for me; the one who has become an important part of my emotional and mental healing. He has proven himself to be trustworthy, smart, sometimes even funny. That’s not too shabby in my book.

I would want to become friends with my therapist so that I could talk to her for extended periods of time and get her advice without paying $150 an hour (or $70 an hour over the phone). I also would like to know about her problems and help her out like she’s helped me. (at great cost, but still). She has told me a far amount about her life, but I would totally be willing to learn more and help her with her problems. However there are a lot of differences between us and we are at different stages of our lives so I don’t think a friendship would work.

The other thing is that since I am planning to become a therapist, it would be great to have her as a mentor. I know there is always a chance that if I stay in the area we would have a professional relationship, but I’d likely avoid that because of the awkwardness. I wonder if this ever comes up though. What happens if a client later becomes a clinical psychology student in the area or a therapist eventually and they end up working with or being trained by their former therapist! (by accident or not).

Also, I agree that the therapist doesn’t always have the power in the relationship. I feel that now its mostly the client and they are like consultants. (especially in CBT and related therapies). Also, in a lot of areas there are so many therapists to chose from, the therapist has to make some effort to attract and retain us.

I also just wanted to add that in some small communities, the client could be the therapist’s butcher or child’s teacher or work in small business the therapist patronizes. Or be a friend of a friend of a friend that you could potential meet at a social gathering. Sometimes a therapist will “bater” and although the client to pay for therapy with free services they can provide. For me, my therapist informed me that we go to the same doctor’s office. In those instances, a post therapy relationship of some kind is possible and likely can’t be completely avoided. However therapist and the client would have to discuss how they want to proceed.

However sexual relationships are not ok. Even if the client feels the relationship is equal.

It is not called a “dual” relationship anymore….changed to “multiple” relationship….which is not necessarily unethical or harmful.

I appreciate the article, because I think that while people will generally recognize and agree that sexual misconduct by a mental health professional is wrong (and in some states it’s also illegal), they often fail to recognize that boundary crossings of a nonsexual nature can be just as harmful. In fact, I would argue that in my case it was the nonsexual boundary crossings that did the most harm. When a therapist/psychiatrist gradually chips away at the boundaries it can make patients completely confused and not trusting their own judgment. It was absolute crazymaking.

Why didn’t I leave? Because I thought I was the screwed up one. It had to be me that was looking for stuff that wasn’t there, I’m just too sensitive, he would never do that, this is my problem I’m just making a big deal out of nothing, and on and on. The extra time, giving me his email address and encouraging me to email him every day thereby fostering an unhealthy dependence on him, his hug that went a little too long, sharing of his personal info that made me a bit uneasy, all the crap that went on was a-okay because we weren’t saying or doing anything overtly sexual, right? No, because even if he had never crossed the ultimate line, I was still a mess by the constant wondering what this meant and what that meant. In fact, it was almost a relief when he kissed me, because then I knew that what I had perceived all along was correct.

For therapists who rationalize crossing some of the boundaries of friendship, etc, what you don’t know is the true impact on that patient. And, in many cases the patient isn’t going to tell you if it’s harming them because they will likely do what I did and worry that it must be their own problem and that they’re the ones misperceiving something or being too sensitive, and so on. Why create those added burdens for your patients even if your intentions are good? The therapist I had after the psychiatrist is not stiff and uncaring, but she does have very good boundaries. You can have good boundaries and still be warm, personable and engaging.

One thing I’ve learned from all this mess is that when I’m around ethical people, there’s none of this wondering about what they mean by this or that. Trust your gut. If it feels wrong, it most likely is (even if it’s not spelled out specifically in the code of ethics).

As a therapist I find that Irvin Yalom’s quote that “friendship is often necessary, but not sufficient” rings true. Most new therapists, and certainly patients don’t have any frame of reference beyond friendship to categorize a sense of closeness and openness than that of a close friendship. In longer-term therapy this relationship is unique for most.

Hopefully this is brought up in any longer term therapy relationship. I talk about these things, since after years of being a therapist, I find that process oriented self-disclosure is powerful and I hope that those I work with openly talk about the therapy experience with me–not merely the words/content of therapy.

The temporary nature of these relationships remind us all of the temporary nature of life in general and of relationships perhaps we have lost. I’ve had more difficulties with the children I’ve worked with then adults. Many of the children have been abandoned by parents or abused, and have limited to no good templates for good/close relationships. Saying goodbye to some of these children has always been the most difficult for me. I have learned to talk about closure issues far in advance, and help them to identify what they like about counseling/our relationship and how they act differently with me and urge them to find/develop this with others in their life, since I will not be there in the future.

Boundaries don’t have to be presented harshly, but I believe the temporary nature of the therapy relationship needs to be addressed, most attuned therapists should realize when this needs to be done–waiting to the last meeting is not a good time. I have felt a sense of sadness saying goodbye to many people over the years, even some of my more challenging patients, but I always remember that the goal is for people to help themselves, and I don’t want to contribute to a sense of victim identity or learned helplessness, by some sense of empathy gone awry. Just because the relationship is temporary and doesn’t continue on doesn’t mean we weren’t ‘friends’ in a sense, I just think its dangerous to fulfill my own psychological needs via my counselor role. I will think fondly of many of those throughout the years whom have removed their masks with me, and struggled to make sense of themselves and their lives and find ways to continue on in this journey called life.

You’ve all made very good points! :)

Would I like to be friends with my therapist? Maybe. Will it ever happen? Not likely.

It is a lovely fantasy to entertain, but in the real world it isn’t possible.

She isn’t a warm cuddly person anyway. The power differential is very clear in my relationship with her.

I believe that some therapists truly care about their clients, but it is important to maintain boundaries.

My therapist can be very insensitive, so I’m not sure that she would be an ideal friend to somebody like me. I like her as a person, but I could never see myself hanging out with her.

Remember…your therapist is your therapist. They are not your friend, no matter how much personal information you have shared with them.

And a sexual relationship with your therapist should NEVER happen. That is a clear violation of ethics and boundaries.

A few years ago, I was seeing a male therapist. He was very kind and compassionate. He was a good listener. He was very attractive.

I started having feelings toward him that made me pull back and look at the situation more objectively.

He was married with children. He never took advantage of me in any way. I doubt that he was even aware of how I felt about him. I never revealed my attraction to him.

Once I recognized that my attraction to him was natural, I was able to deal with how inappropriate it would be if I acted on my feelings.

I wasn’t in love with him…it’s just that he represented the kind of male figure I wanted to have in MY life.

We all would love to have a friend that we can share our innermost feelings with, who will always listen and never judge, who will be there.

We want somebody to share life with and do fun things with.

But our therapist cannot provide all of those things.

What if it’s the other way around? In my case, I have had a very rewarding relationship with my Gestalt therapist. If I had an urgent problem, I felt quite comfortable texting her, and she would respond. Eventually, we started connecting outside the therapeutic context by sending each other things we thought the other would like: music, articles, quotes, etc, much like I do with my friends. But then I felt it was too much which I communicated to her; I need her as a therapist much more than as a friend, even though the desire to explore the friendship is still there. She feels hurt by it, and I don’t know what I should do. I really respect and cherish this woman, but I feel I still have work to do. I am going to discuss this with her, and if neccessary, seek therapy elsewhere, but I am curious to hear if anyone else has had a similar experience?

A little over two years after I stopped seeing my psychologist in a professional relationship I was back in town, called her and asked if it would be appropriate to have dinner with me. She agreed and we had a very pleasant time, not in any way bordering on therapy. Since then, when I return to the area, I always contact her and we go out to dinner or eat at her house. I always enjoy it and I believe she does too or else she wouldn’t continue the practice. We do not go into therapeutic issues, we talk about what we are doing and what we have done since the last time we visited. We also exchange Christmas cards/letters.

I believe this relationship is appropriate, ethical and mutually positive.

On the other hand, my current psychologist has many characteristics of my past one but I would never ask for a friend relationship while in therapy. I have given her one gift, a bowl bowl I threw in a pottery class which she appropriately accepted. I think buying her a gift would not be appropriate nor would it be good to give a gift on a regular basis. She maintains professional boundaries. Even my case manager (social worker) watches boundaries carefully. I once offered to loan her the book Unquiet Mind and she declined and said she couldn’t accept a loan of anything from me. (She did accept a bowl which I appreciated.)

It isn’t called a “dual” relationship anymore…that was changed a few years ago. It is now called a “multiple” relationship…and it (DSM) states that not ALL multiple relationships are harmful.”

I am friends with my old therapist now. We are actually really good friends and catch up for coffee a lot. There does come that time when she tries to be the therapist still but not very often and I don’t think it is harmful at all.

This entire issue is difficult. I think that if there is a large amount of internal conflict about carrying on a relationship with a therapist or client post-therapy, then perhaps the solution is to not have one. This seems like something that should occur naturally and ethically. I will illustrate with from what I am learning. My therapist is more like a mentor and mother type figure to me. We both understand that our current relationship is that of therapist and client, and those boundaries must be upheld while we continue through the healing process. Once that is done, we both understand there is room for a mentoring role from one older woman to a younger. This is a mutually agreed upon and mutually expressed desire from us both in understanding where we’ve both come from and where we’d like to proceed. Hope this helps.

I’m cutting it off with mine especially after reading everything online about transference. My therapist keeps herself like a girl that one would pick up at a bar, with piercing and dyed hair (serious). And although I don’t feel in love or anything I felt some attraction.

The problem I have is that since you can not do anything with your therapist this is the same f***ing bullshit as in real life and I would much rather have a girl that I can do anything I went with rather than pine over some dummy that would potentially rather just shuffle me away because it is part of ethics, the job, etc. It feels the same as just ordinary every day life (and as it probably should after I read all this stuff). It sucks so I think I just need a therapist that is older or something.

Would I have sex with my therapist? yeah but would it ever happen? no. and plus getting turned down is just as bad as what is described as actually having these encounters with the therapist.

so all in all I give up. I don’t know if I’m a special case or what but this is a sad part of life and to hell with it. If the therapist feels great about having that kind of power then good for her, but I could rather care less at this point.

This is one reason I will never do therapy again. Therapists think they are better than their clients, as if they know it all. Psychiatry is mental rape, anyway.

I would like to show thanks to you just for bailing me out of this particular difficulty. Right after exploring throughout the internet and obtaining views that were not productive, I thought my life was gone. Existing without the presence of strategies to the issues you’ve resolved as a result of the article is a serious case, and ones which may have adversely affected my career if I hadn’t encountered your site. Your personal capability and kindness in controlling all the things was precious. I don’t know what I would have done if I had not encountered such a thing like this. I am able to at this time relish my future. Thank you very much for this expert and sensible guide. I will not think twice to suggest your blog post to anyone who should get recommendations on this issue.

I saw my psychologist for anxiety (CBT). He was/is older, charming and I (quite naturally) completely fell for him. This was some time ago, and I wonder if it were not for the ethical considerations he had; if we would not have been together now. I feel emotionally, we clicked in every way. I have met up with him recently. The feelings of attraction are still very much there for me. My problem is I do not know if he is just being nice/polite by meeting me or not(I am an undergraduate of psychology now – go figure!). We are both now in other relationships but we shared a hug instigated by myself and I want more! Oh help me, I want so much more!!! The intensity of attraction for this man to kiss me is beyond anything I have ever experienced in my whole life! He told me “around the houses” that he thought I was very attractive whilst I was in therapy… ie “Do you know Amanda, you are strikingly beautiful to men?” This was in context as I was talking about being single and never meeting anyone. But a long time ago. I wish he would just tell me one way or the other what he felt. I think I shall always be deeply in love with him…

53 Comments to
“Why You Can't be Friends With Your Therapist – Ever!”

Ask a Question or Post a Comment:


    Last reviewed: 10 Jan 2010

APA Reference
Neale, S. (2010). Why You Can't be Friends With Your Therapist – Ever!. Psych Central. Retrieved on February 11, 2012, from http://blogs.psychcentral.com/unplugged/2010/01/why-you-cant-be-friends-with-your-therapist-ever/

 

Therapy
Unplugged



Subscribe to this Blog:
Feed


Or Get a Single, Daily Email (enter email address):

via FeedBurner



Archives

Recent Comments
  • Jen: Can’t believe a therapist would tell a patient that she “loved her”,even to reassure & be...
  • Cee: It seems as though the longer I’ve been going to therapy, the faster the minutes fly when I’m in...
  • Muriel Dagan: I have to flatter my therapist for them to help me? I was a paying client. Sheesh. . .
  • Muriel Dagan: I feel for everyone on this blog- you do not know how outraged I feel for all of your pain. I can...
  • Muriel Dagan: Also, this same therapist kept a book I lent her then acted dumb, and never returned it. I mailed her a...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter



Find a Therapist


Users Online: 2346
Join Us Now!