No wonder we cry at birth! From the get go, it seems, Mother Nature gives us a series of challenging tasks to overcome, and doesn’t just wait.

It starts from the very first breath when our body tells us we’re now to breathe, eat and digest the nutrients we need to survive on our own, no longer needing our mother’s body to breathe us.

Each task assures us we are fully equipped with everything we need inside to survive and reach our developmental milestones. Later we learn we have inborn miracle-making resources, such as for imagination and possibility thinking, that seemingly invite us to transcend the physical limits of our nature.

Born with a burning curiosity, not unlike scientists, we yearn to know everything there is to know about ourselves and our world. Learning is one of our key attributes as human beings, by the way. A healthy brain is most always in “learning mode” and only in “protective mode” in situations that pose real threats or danger.

How could we have known then, however, what becomes clear later in life, that: these developmental life tasks, as painful as they may be, are designed to grow us, to strengthen and to enrich us, and perhaps to grow our wisdom, every step of the way, so that we learn to live and love authentically with our whole heart?

We may not like it, but we are wired to struggle, to learn, and to engage in processes that make us feel vulnerable and yet expand our reach, as the work of researcher Brene Brown reveals, and allow us to continually move out of the limiting ‘comfort zones’ we tend to create as natural aspects in our growth and development throughout the course of life. Many of these ‘comfort zones’ serve an essential purpose, for a time, until they no longer serve us, at which time they become ‘stuck’ places.

In any case, it is safe to say, we have abilities far greater than we think or could have imagined as children.

The First Task of Life?

As infants and small children, our first task is to win our parents’ love. Babies do not survive without love. Food, shelter, sustenance do not suffice.

As studies of attachment show, small children actively seek a love bonding with their caregivers. To live, newborns must form some type of bond, whether secure or not, with their mother or a “mothering” person, at least one.

Clearly the driving Principle that moves young children to do what they do is: to be loved is all that matters; it is life itself.

The recent works of neuroscientists, such Ramachadran, have uprooted old ideas and views of human nature. In his words,

“The curious reciprocity between self and others is especially well developed in humans and probably exists only in rudimentary form in the great apes. I have suggested that many types of mental illness may result from derangements in this equilibrium.”

Though science has taught us to believe otherwise, love is the most compelling force for our species, and not survival.

There is perhaps nothing more frightening to us, as children, than the possibility that we would not be loved or accepted by key persons in our lives. We have inborn yearnings for belonging and acceptance, for example. These emotional drives shape most every behavior, and are associated with our core fears, such as rejection, inadequacy or abandonment.

Our autonomic nervous system continually collects data, and is ready to activate our body’s stress response (‘fight or flee), which puts the parasympathetic nervous system in control of our body – and our choices.

Since our bodies come pre-wired with knowledge of what we need to survive, it’s safe to say that we were born with a felt “knowing” that our physical survival completely depended on these early emotional bonds. That is, our sense of physical safety is intrinsically linked to our sense of emotional safety in any moment, and this link is particularly strong in the early years.

Our parents’ responses were like mirrors that sent emotional messages to us, telling us what they needed from us, whom they thought we were and what they thought the world was like. The work of neuroscientist Damasio on “mirror neurons” shows, among other things, that infants’ faces reflect back the emotional data they receive from their parents’ faces, such as happy, sad, worried or calm.

If our parents were scared and insecure about their sense of value or worth in relation to us, life in general or key adults in their lives, or key adults in their lives, and many if not most parents are in our culture, we likely learned to disconnect from or mistrust our inner abilities to think, to feel and to be present to our self, especially to our emotions of vulnerability.

Why? Because that’s how our parents dealt with their own inner world of emotions and thoughts, and thus, how they responded to our emotional responses to life around us.

How could they be present to our fears, after all, when they didn’t know how to be present to their own?

Love is the first task of life, and it is no small matter. We come into this world hardwired with an emotional sense that experiences love, and thus the love we give and receive, as a life or death proposition.

As adults, we can lose sight of the fact that, in early childhood, this compelling drive to feed on love and to need human connection is about ensuring our physical survival.

Like all autonomic processes of the body, when it comes to survival, the subconscious mind is in charge.

Built-in Safety – “Early Survival-Love Maps”

Even in optimal conditions, the quest to be loved makes early childhood inherently wounding, a fragile period of life at best.

It is just as impossible, for example, for a child not to experience fear and pain as it is for an adult. We may hide, mask or numb it, however, our core fears and vulnerabilities are an integral part of life as breathing. They are there as markers and action signals to help us navigate our life.

The truth is, we experience scary moments all the time.

Thankfully, however, the human brain is designed with a built-in safety feature!

I like to call them “early survival-love maps,” as they are neural patterns that, as protective mechanisms, played a critical role in our survival in childhood.

These neural patterns “worked” to keep us as emotionally healthy as possible in childhood. How? They helped us get quick-fix doses of hormones released in our bloodstream, the “safety and love” hormone oxytocin in particular.

Our “own” survival-love maps were first formed in early experiences within the first 3-5 years of our life. These early relating or attachment patterns between us and our parents were imprinted in the neural circuitry of our brains, forming a set of instructions or “rules” that can endure throughout life, according to Dr. Daniel Siegel.

This transmission of sensory data also formed our earliest sense of self as separate from our parents. As we developed, this pool of data largely formed our self-concept, even though we carried a lot of our parents’ stuff mixed in with our own.

Memories of when and what activated our body’s “fight or flee” system received special attention from our subconscious mind, which is in charge of early survival-love maps, among other similar processes, such as the formation of habits and memories. Whenever our human parents were upset or anxious, for example, regardless whether their anxiety was directed at us, or some other person or event, this likely activated our own survival response. The brain is in its most alert state when the body’s survival response, or “fight or flee” activates.

Why “early survival-love maps” no longer work?

Literally, early survival-love maps allow children to subconsciously distort their experiences and to create illusions instead, whatever it takes it seems — for them to feel the level of emotional safety they need, with regard to their hardwired impulses to feel loved.

This map consists of a set of rules our brain learned to follow that was shaped directly by our early experiences as children. They can endure a lifetime, and tend to become particularly rigid in trauma.  Subconsciously, we “decided” or “learned” certain rules that best ensured we would receive some measure of “good feelings,” albeit quick-fixes, by releasing certain hormones in our bloodstream.

Mostly subconscious, these often limiting “rules” tell our brains how to relate to those closest to us, for example, how to get quick-fixes of love to survive.

At some point in adulthood, this map outlived its usefulness to us. No longer the solution, it became part of the problem instead.

Unless we break free of our dependency on these “early survival-love maps” in adulthood, they take charge of our mind and body, as follows:

  • They block us from connecting inwardly to get to know ourselves and others intimately.
  • They come to our (emotional) rescue by activating our protective defense strategies.
  • They keep us thinking that we are dependent on others to love and value us before we can feel loved and valued.
  • They persuade us to rely on (addictive) sources outside of ourselves for safety, strength and happiness.
  • They hijack our efforts to remain calm, confident, centered when we feel stressed or triggered.
  • They treat us as if we are more vulnerable than we actually are, like an overprotective parent who decides what’s best “our own good.”

In short, early survival-love maps block the formation of healthy intimacy and relationship bonding in adulthood.

Nevertheless, it’s interesting to ponder why nature would make illusions part of the plan in childhood.

Make no mistake, it’s a deliberate process.

Every human being has universal strivings to matter and feel valued in relation to life and others. In order to survive, a small child must attempt to fulfill a task that is, truthfully speaking, impossible to achieve, even in the best of family circumstances!

How do we make sense of this phenomenon?

Relationships in life follow formulas as precisely as the field of mathematics. One of these rules of nature is that life is not about the destination; it’s about the process.

Life is about the journey, and not the destination. It’s about showing up, with a heart open to learn to love.

Nature’s plan has never been about getting our parents and others to unconditionally love us; and rather about the lessons, and what we learn about ourselves and life, along the way.

Now, as an adult, it’s a matter of who you want to put in charge of the power you have to make life-shaping choices. Will it be you as a conscious agent and choice maker of your life – or your subconscious survival-love map?

Emotional pain is part of life.

The good news is that pain is more of an asset than a nuisance. It is a vital teacher and guide, alerting you to pay attention, or signaling you what works and what doesn’t work to help you do more than merely survive — also thrive.

There’s more good news. Human beings are resilient! The human brain has a capacity, known as plasticity, which makes it possible for you to heal and change limiting patterns throughout life.

If you are alive, with most of your faculties intact, regardless your childhood experiences, you have all you need, inside, to create and to live a vibrant life.

Whereas the most compelling principle of early childhood is “to matter is to be loved,” a distinctly different principle operates in adulthood. More on this and the “Later Task of Life” in an upcoming post!

In the meantime, I’d love to hear from you, your thoughts, insights, experiences!

RESOURCES:

Damasio, Antonio (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. NY: Pantheon Books.

Brown, Brene (2010). The Gifts of Imperfection: Let Go of Who You Think You’re Supposed to Be and Embrace Who You. NY: Hazelden Publishing.

Ramachandran, Vilayanur S. (2011). The Tell-Tale Brain: A Neuroscientist’s Quest For What Makes Us Human. NY: Norton & Company.

Siegel, Daniel J. (2010). Mindsight: The New Science of Personal Transformation. NY: Bantam Books.

 


Comments


View Comments / Leave a Comment

This post currently has 26 comments.
You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts.

Trackbacks

Carolyn Anderson (July 10, 2011)

From Psych Central's website:
PsychCentral (July 10, 2011)

Delicious Flavour (July 10, 2011)

Athena Staik, Ph.D. (July 10, 2011)

Dario Da Ponte (July 10, 2011)

Dario Da Ponte (July 10, 2011)

Dorlee M (July 10, 2011)

Dr. Ellen Weber (July 10, 2011)

Athena Staik, Ph.D. (July 10, 2011)

Alisa Vitti (July 10, 2011)

Athena Staik, Ph.D. (July 10, 2011)

Regarding Baby (July 10, 2011)

Gina Osher (July 10, 2011)

From Psych Central's website:
PsychCentral (July 11, 2011)

From Psych Central's World of Psychology:
Best of Our Blogs: July 12, 2011 | World of Psychology (July 12, 2011)

Planting seeds: The value of validation. | Life, Love, Balance (July 30, 2011)

From Psych Central's website:
3 Types of Change Your Brain Adapts (3 of 3) | Neuroscience and Relationships (September 19, 2011)

The Neuroscience of ‘Genuine’ Love – And What Love Quotes Say! | (November 13, 2011)

Life Designs | Rescue Youth (November 23, 2011)

Melanie Greenberg (April 14, 2012)

Melanie Greenberg (April 14, 2012)

Melanie Greenberg (April 15, 2012)

Melanie Greenberg (April 15, 2012)

dotJenna (November 20, 2012)






    Last reviewed: 18 Jan 2013

APA Reference
Staik, A. (2011). The First Task of Life? Survival and Our Quest to Be Loved. Psych Central. Retrieved on October 26, 2014, from http://blogs.psychcentral.com/relationships/2011/07/the-first-task-of-life-survival-and-the-early-childhood-quest-to-be-loved/

 

 

Subscribe to this Blog: Feed

Recent Comments
  • Patricia: I just read your article and I was shocked to realize this was me in my life, right now. I have been scared...
  • Athena Staik, Ph.D.: Thanks for commenting, Stellar. It may be disturbing to think of pornography as...
  • Athena Staik, Ph.D.: Thanks for the comment, however, I’m puzzled why it’s “crap” for a...
  • rawr: This is crap. It’s literally what every woman says they want but rarely go for. If you want a good man...
  • Stellar36: As much as I agree with the whole connotation of this article I believe one part of the industry is...
Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 12240
Join Us Now!