Sri Mariamman Temple, SingaporeAdi Da wrote in “Not-Two is Peace”:

“Humankind is functioning on the principle of ego – or separate identity and separative activity.  Separateness and separateness – or ego-”I” – is the idea of “difference.” That idea inevitably manifests as the process of “objectification,” control, and destruction.  [...]  The right action of humankind is action based on the presumption of prior unity – not ego, not “tribes,” not any kind of form, idea, or cultural expression that came about or emerged in times of dis-unity.”

Adi Da would probably disagree with my concept of Neural Tribe.  He’d probably say that this too is a form of dis-unity, that categorizing life into neural and non-neural is just another separative difference.  And I’d agree with that, I’d agree with Adi Da.  I realize that redefining humanity as neurality is just a smaller of the separative evils.  And yet, I think, it is a step in the right direction: it is a use of separativeness towards unification.  The idea here is to expand the radius of identification – from Human Tribe (HT) to Neural Tribe (NT).  In so doing, I am, in essence, inviting the humanity to bypass the intra-group distinctions (the kinds of tribal distinctions within the Human Tribe that Adi Da was writing about).  I am inviting Humankind to redefine itself as Neurokind so as to shift to non-tribal kindness.

The “big idea” here is to try to bypass our intra-tribal distinctions by broadening the definition of our tribe – from Human Tribe to Neural Tribe.  The idea is to reverse-engineer what Adi Da called “prior unity” by first learning to relate to our neural brothers and sisters in the animal kingdom.  This “big idea” is an old idea, it’s an intuitive idea, it’s a cliche idea: we know that having a relationship with a pet animal tames our own separative mind-beast.  This is one of the therapeutic mechanisms behind the use of pet therapy as empathy-training, say, in prison populations.

Like Adi Da (and Gurdjieff and countless others) I see the self-Adi Da wrote in “Not-Two is Peace”:

“Humankind is functioning on the principle of ego – or separate identity and separative activity.  Separateness and separateness – or ego-”I” – is the idea of “difference.” That idea inevitably manifests as the process of “objectification,” control, and destruction.  [...]  The right action of humankind is action based on the presumption of prior unity – not ego, not “tribes,” not any kind of form, idea, or cultural expression that came about or emerged in times of dis-unity.”

Adi Da would probably disagree with my concept of Neural Tribe.  He’d probably say that this too is a form of dis-unity, that categorizing life into neural and non-neural is just another separative difference.  And I’d agree with that, I’d agree with Adi Da.  I realize that redefining humanity as neurality is just a smaller of the separative evils.  And yet, I think, it is a step in the right direction: it is a use of separativeness towards unification.  The idea here is to expand the radius of identification – from Human Tribe (HT) to Neural Tribe (NT).  In so doing, I am, in essence, inviting the humanity to bypass the intra-group distinctions (the kinds of tribal distinctions within the Human Tribe that Adi Da was writing about).  I am inviting Humankind to redefine itself as Neurokind so as to shift to non-tribal kindness.

The “big idea” here is to try to bypass our intra-tribal distinctions by broadening the definition of our tribe – from Human Tribe to Neural Tribe.  The idea is to reverse-engineer what Adi Da called “prior unity” by first learning to relate to our neural brothers and sisters in the animal kingdom.  This “big idea” is an old idea, it’s an intuitive idea, it’s a cliche idea: we know that having a relationship with a pet animal tames our own separative mind-beast.  This is one of the therapeutic mechanisms behind the use of pet therapy as empathy-training, say, in prison populations.

Like Adi Da (and Gurdjieff and countless others) I see the self-imprisonment of the human mind.  And I ask myself: what is the path towards self-liberation?  A personal path is simple: meditation.  But what’s a social path, a society-wide path?  The answer is cultural reprogramming, a redefining of the human narrative in a scientifically-intuitive way.  The Neural Tribe idea is tautologically simple and grounded in fact: a neuron is a neuron is a neuron, regardless of the body-form that it inhabits.  This is the basis of identification with a larger tribe, with the Neurokind.  And this identification is, in turn, the basis for compassion and non-tribal kindness, Neurokindness, the kind of kindness that focuses on the fact that we are all of one and the same neural kind.

To clarify: kindness begins with recognizing that the Other is of the same kind and, as such, is Self (kindness = identification).

Is it a pipe dream?

It’s not even a pipe dream.  It’s just something to think about.

What will it change?

Maybe everything, but most likely, nothing…. It might not change what we do, it just might change how we do what we do.  For example, it might not change what we eat, it just might change how we eat. That sort of thing…

of the human mind.  And I ask myself: what is the path towards self-liberation?  A personal path is simple: meditation.  But what’s a social path, a society-wide path?  The answer is cultural reprogramming, a redefining of the human narrative in a scientifically-intuitive way.  The Neural Tribe idea is tautologically simple and grounded in fact: a neuron is a neuron is a neuron, regardless of the body-form that it inhabits.  This is the basis of identification with a larger tribe, with the Neurokind.  And this identification is, in turn, the basis for compassion and non-tribal kindness, Neurokindness, the kind of kindness that focuses on the fact that we are all of one and the same neural kind.

To clarify: kindness begins with recognizing that the Other is of the same kind and, as such, is Self (kindness = identification).

Is it a pipe dream?

It’s not even a pipe dream.  It’s just something to think about.

What will it change?

Maybe everything, but most likely, nothing…. It might not change what we do, it just might change how we do what we do.  For example, it might not change what we eat, it just might change how we eat. That sort of thing…

More on Neural Tribe

Related: 360 Degrees of Compassion

www.drsomov.com

-

Creative Commons License photo credit: specialoperations

 


Comments


View Comments / Leave a Comment

This post currently has 0 comments. Trackback this story from your site or blog.

Trackbacks






    Last reviewed: 17 Nov 2012

APA Reference
Somov, P. (2012). From Humankind to Neurokind to Kindness. Psych Central. Retrieved on November 22, 2014, from http://blogs.psychcentral.com/mindful-living/2012/11/from-humankind-to-neurokind-to-kindness/

 

Reinventing the Meal
Reinventing the Meal
Present Perfect
Eating the Moment
The Lotus Effect The Smoke-Free Smoke Break
Pavel G. Somov, Ph.D. is the author of The Lotus Effect, Present Perfect, The Smoke-Free Smoke Break, and Eating the Moment: 141 Mindful Practices to Overcome Overeating One Meal at a Time.


Subscribe to this Blog:
Feed


Or Get a Single, Daily Email (enter email address):

via FeedBurner



Recent Comments
  • Joan Winifred: Hand stitch…or machine? Seamless (yet not meaningless) Nice needlework aka poetry:)
  • best honeymoon resort: Cancun has got several golfing clubs with scenic locations that are considered to be a few of...
  • Garage Remodeling: Omg. Great style. Exactly how did an individual make absolute sure it had sufficient place and...
  • Pavel G. Somov, Ph.D.: I follow. Well said. Thank you.
  • oldblackdog: This is a reaction to A Snapshot of Self” I used to “do” a lot of photography, old...
Find a Therapist
Enter ZIP or postal code



Users Online: 12240
Join Us Now!