Forensic Focus

Archive for June, 2010

Is Joran van der Sloot a Psychopath?

Monday, June 14th, 2010

The media has been abuzz in the last two weeks about the capture of Joran van der Sloot, a Dutch national charged in the murder of 21-year-old Stephany Flores of Peru. van der Sloot was also a suspect in the 2005 disappearance of Natalee Holloway, an 18-year-old Alabama resident who disappeared on a high school graduation trip in Aruba.

Stephany Flores was killed in a Lima hotel on May 30th, 2010; five years to the day after Natalee Holloway disappeared. van der Sloot was arrested twice in the Holloway case but was freed for lack of evidence.

“Odd Mental Kinks:” A 1935 Perspective on Psychopathy

Friday, June 11th, 2010

Another forensic psychology blog featured an article written by Arthur Grahame in 1935. The article was published in the May 1935 edition of Popular Science magazine and discusses psychopathy. It’s an interesting read, and while some of the information has been disproved, a good portion of the article describes psychopathy within similar constructs of today’s standards.

Interestingly, the article also discusses the dilemma of housing mentally ill persons in prison settings while occasionally treating psychopathic individuals in mental institutions. This is still a common occurrence today; as state psychiatric hospitals continue to close down, the mentally ill are redirected into the correctional system. As a result, there are more mentally ill people in the correctional system than in hospitals.

Speak Up for Your Right to Remain Silent? Supreme Court Rules on Miranda Rights

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

In its third Miranda ruling this session, the Supreme Court ruled today that a suspect must “unambiguously” state his or her desire to invoke their Miranda rights (referring to the right to remain silent in this case) in order for those rights to be protected.

This case came to the Supreme Court after the lower courts conflicted on whether a confessional statement from a suspect, who remained mostly silent throughout a three plus hour police investigation, was valid in court.

Specifically, in this case, the suspect, Van Chester Thompkins, offered little verbal response throughout his interrogation, but three hours into his interrogation, he implicated himself in the crime by giving an affirmative answer to one of the officer’s questions. He later tried to revoke his confessional statement by stating that he was using his right to remain silent, hence why he was so quiet throughout the rest of the interrogation.

Recent Comments
  • Jenn: Hmmn…I always thought of Bundy as more of a sociopath (but I could be wrong). He never knew his father...
  • Kathy: I write military thrillers and was looking for a simple no-nonsense answer as to which my characters primarily...
  • L: My friend told me she thinks I need to be evaluated. She once said she thinks I have antisocial personality...
  • Louise: Claire, I’d like to know the same thing. I recently left a two year relationship with someone very...
  • Dexter: Claire-the person you’re describing sounds like a giant control freak, brown noser, and classic...
Subscribe to Our Weekly Newsletter



Find a Therapist


Users Online: 3735
Join Us Now!