In my last several posts, I’ve reviewed what mental health court is, and the pros and cons of such a system. In my final post on this topic, we’ll take a look at what the future holds for mental health courts in the United States and some of the recommendations to improve upon this system.
Research from mental health courts that have been in operation for a few years has suggested that overall, mental health courts are here to stay. Communities that have implemented a mental health court system have found that the pros outweigh the cons, and have begun to look at ways to improve the functioning of mental health courts.
Overall, it is important that the criminal justice system not serve as the entryway for mental health services. The more preventative measures we can build into the mental health system, the more likely we are to catch these hard to serve populations prior to committing a crime.
This is the last post of a four part series exploring mental health courts. This series examined the role of mental health courts, the pros and cons of such courts, and future considerations. (To read the other posts in this series, click here.)
If you, or someone you know, has a mental illness and becomes involved with the criminal justice system, consider reading the article “Dealing with the Criminal Justice System” by the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). The article provides a great overview of what to expect throughout the criminal proceedings, and offers unique information for those with a mental illness.
This post currently has
You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts.
From Psych Central's World of Psychology:
Best of Our Blogs: April 20, 2010 | World of Psychology (April 20, 2010)
Last reviewed: 18 Apr 2010