The mother of the man accused of killing little 6-year-old Makayla Sitton said her son, Paul Michael Merhige, recently purchased two guns. She said her son had a mental breakdown when he was 19-years-old and has suffered from severe depression and obsessive compulsive disorder since then. Among the drugs he had been prescribed: Ativan, an anti-anxiety benzo, and Seroquel, an antipsychotic used to treat depression, bipolar and schizophrenia – which worked well for me.
She also said this:
“A person with a history of mental problems should not be able to get a gun,” she said. “This is such a big country. Why isn’t there a database of mentally ill people?”
Actually, there is a database of mentally ill
people and a federal law that prohibits gun sales to people who have been declared mentally ill by a court. But neither the database nor the law would have prevented Merhige from buying a gun.
There are loopholes. What if you are mentally ill and come from a family that can afford to send you to a private hospital, treatment center, take care of you at home or pay your rent? You have a history of suicide attempts and violence but you never enter the court system because your family protects you from the law.
Or, what if you have been involuntarily committed but your state does not enter your case in the FBI’s database? The law only works if the clerks of court report your commitment to the state law enforcement agency that enters your name into the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System database. Gun dealers must consult the database before selling a gun.
That law has been on the books since federal lawmakers passed the 1969 Gun Control Act. The FBI’s NICS database was created in 1994 to collect and store names of ineligible buyers. But many states don’t bother to report mental health commitments. Only 22 states were reporting in 2007, when Seung Hui Cho bought a gun and killed 32 people at Virginia Tech. A judge had found Cho mentally ill and ordered him to treatment but Virginia officials failed to report his commitment to the FBI.
But the law and database did not – and could not – protect Makayla and three others killed on Thanksgiving, including the gunman’s twin sisters, because Merhige was never declared insane, incompetent or involuntarily committed. His court record was clean – although his mental illness is well documented, according to his family.
The law is well intentioned but makes me queasy. Maybe it has prevented other massacres. We will never know. But I do know this: If you want anything bad enough, you can and will get it. Just ask any addict or alcoholic. I could drive a mile north of my house and buy a gun right now. It’s 10:30 pm. Or, I could go to the county fairground the next time a gun show comes to town and buy a gun without any checks at all. Or, I could look in the glove box of my neighbor’s car – where he keeps a loaded handgun (despite my yelling at him one Saturday afternoon when he left the car’s windows down and doors unlocked.)
And who is to say that a person who was involuntarily committed to a mental hospital 20 years ago for attempting suicide is still a danger and should not be allowed to purchase a hunting rifle and go deer hunting with his buddies? What about alcoholism – also a mental illness? Should an alcoholic who is court ordered into treatment be forever barred from owning a gun after years of sobriety?
I don’t know the answer to this conundrum. The journalist in me, who covered the trials of many mentally ill killers, says “Hell, no! Don’t let them ever get near a gun.” The recovered alcoholic with depression and bipolar inside of me says it is not fair to take away a citizen’s constitutional right to bear arms because they were very, very sick at a point in the lives.
Some of us do get well, you know.
The U.S. Marshals Service has launched a nationwide manhunt to find Merhige.
Related Posts
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The killer has depression, OCD a history of suicide attempts and two new guns By Christine Stapleton December 4, 2009 « The Mental Health Minute (December 26, 2009)
Hello,
When I was little, my mom frequently had my sent to the children’s psychiatric hospital as a form of punishment. If I got suspended from school, got in a fight with my brother or did something else she had a problem with she would call the hospital and tell them I tried to kill myself. Because it’s suicide, I was taken without a chance to even explain what happened. I was often put down as “Danger to self and others”. Which is one of many illnesses that prevents one from owning a gun. Because of my mother’s form of punishment, I am not allowed to own a firearm and I have never hurt anyone. Though these days, I am not even sure I am sane anymore. I mean what does being in a mental hospital when your fine do to you? Can being in a mental hospital when your well MAKE you mentally ill? Who knows. I know I didn’t feel this way before the stays started. I have not been the same since. The closest thing I can own to a actual fire arm is a air powered pelet gun.
-Stanley
I will never own a gun, nor will I allow one in my home, however while I believe that we do have the right to bear arms, are the mentally ill singled out to not own a gun? I was committed involuntarily to the state hospital after a serious suicide attempt- the court became involved 9 days later, I don’t ever remember being asked if I wanted to stay and get treatment- within 48 hours of my release from ICU, they had me on so many drugs that I was a zombie. Does this ‘commitment’ mean I can never regain my right to own a gun? I was in a state of severe depression, which I am no longer in. Was my commitment reported to the FBI? It seems that if someone has a question of mental illness rather than rubber stamping ‘NO” on the application, maybe there needs to be an investigation, an independent DOCTOR making the decision, not a sales clerk with no knowledge of mental illness. As stated in the article, relying on a database doesn’t insure that guns don’t get into the wrong hands.
Last reviewed: 10 Feb 2010