(UPDATE: I’ve since posted my own review of Mental. Please take a deep breath before bashing it.
)
FOX’s new “medical mystery drama” Mental premieres tonight. According to FOX:
MENTAL is a medical mystery drama featuring Dr. Jack Gallagher, a radically unorthodox psychiatrist who becomes Director of Mental Health Services at a Los Angeles hospital where he takes on patients battling unknown, misunderstood and often misdiagnosed psychiatric conditions. Gallagher delves inside their minds to gain a true understanding of who his patients are, allowing him to uncover what might be the key to their long-term recovery.
Hmm. A “radically unorthodox” doctor who “delves inside” the minds of “patients battling unknown, misunderstood and often misdiagnosed psychiatric conditions”? Mental sounds suspiciously like, oh, I don’t know - House?
It’s not getting such hot reviews, either.
“Mental” is just as unrealistic and haphazard as any other B-grade medical series on the television dial. (The Salt Lake Tribune)
[...] Dr. Jack Gallagher, the newly hired director of psychiatric services at L.A.’s Wharton Memorial Hospital, is one of the most deeply irritating television characters ever conceived [...] mental illness is not something to be jollied out of someone; a diagnosis does not necessarily equal cure — even if the doctor is a Charming Rogue With Accent (patent pending). (The Hollywood Reporter)
The only problem with [the episode's first scene] is that it’s highly improbable, not to mention smug and ignorant. Play acting in someone else’s delusion may sound like a good idea to the writers of “Mental” (the name itself reveals the triteness with which the subject matter is handled), but few psychiatric professionals would encourage or condone such an approach, especially for a patient in a florid state of psychosis. (The Wall Street Journal)
Ouch, ouch, and ouch.
Not everyone has such bad things to say, though. Nicholas Gonzalez (whoa), who plays Dr. Arturo Suarez, claims the series is “groundbreaking”:
“For the first time, we have a drama that delves into the head, the psyche, the subconscious of patients, rather than just giving us reactions from the doctors.”
Despite finding more poor reviews than good ones, and even though it seems like FOX is reheating leftovers, I plan to watch at least tonight’s episode of Mental, and for two unsurprising reasons:
Who knows? It could turn out to be pretty good.
Related Posts
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
From Psych Central's Alicia Sparks:
‘Mental’: Pros, Cons, And…Did I Miss The Theme Song? | Celebrity Psychings (May 27, 2009)
When my wife and I saw the preview for this show, I immediately dreaded it. It’s amazing to me that writers with no training in this area or understanding of the research that is available feel competent to write such things.
Mental illnesses can be misdiagnosed, but they can also be systematically assessed in a highly reliable manner.
Sometimes people do respond to “unorthodox” treatments, but far more often, they respond to empirically supported treatments developed through years of thoughtful work on the part of researchers and clinicians.
Perpetuating misunderstandings of mental illness and therapy is not only not helpful, it’s actually hurtful. Perhaps that kind of thing is fun for the writers, but personally, I care more about treating those in need.
I hope you write a review of the first episode! I don’t think I’ll be able to get myself to watch it.
Perhaps you want to retract this article? I watched the show last night (no, I hadn’t read your article first.) The show was astonishingly bad. When the doc suggested treating a schizophrenic patient with homeopathy and aromatherapy, I figured the writers must have included Scientologists and others totally clueless about severe mental illness. We can only hope this show dies a quick death; the last thing we want is anyone ‘learning’ about mental illness from this show.
@ Mike - I’m working on the review right now
Did you end up watching it? I’m so glad you stopped by. I need to get over to PBB soon. I’ve been so swamped lately.
@ Vicki - Why would I retract it?
Ugh. I watched this show and all I could think was “House knock-off!” The doc is as arrogant as House (oddly, this guy is a Brit, and while Hugh Laurie is British, he loses his accent entirely as House) and even more unconventional to the point of being dangerous. The psychiatry, well, it’s not psychiatry, it is witchcraft.
He rides a bicycle; House rides a motorcycle. House limps; Gallagher appears to have lost part of his leg and walks just fine. There is the stereotypical retinue of a Cuddy-like administrator and doting minions. All of this aside, it is just a BAD SHOW. I hope it goes, and soon, because I love House and don’t want to see him being ripped off.
Finally, there was nothing “misdiagnosed” about the patient at all, and, as far as I know, people with schizophrenia cannot, sadly, function without medication.
I watched it on-and-off flipping between it and the hockey game trying to avoid commercials. My concern with it was not that it perpetuated stigma about mental illness (while it probably did), but rather that it was boring. I am more passionate about hating other shows, such as the Big Bang Theory (what an idiotic peice of crap that is).
I didn’t watch it, but I did read some preview articles and decided I’d rather watch “In Treatment” in reruns, than devote even one hour to “Mental”.
It’s hard to digest a fast food burger when you’ve become accustomed to filet mignon.
Actually, Gallagher was pretty definite about the fact that the schizophrenic patient would have to be medicated for the rest of his life (it was easy to miss that in the scene perhaps, if you were reeling from the aromatherapy line). What he SAID was that the patient might be over-medicated, as his drug treatment had evidently not been changed in 12 years, and seeing as he was already mostly de-toxed, it would be worth trying a new drug therapy, one which may allow the patient some more balance.
I’ll give it another episode before crossing it off my list.
Oh, and Gallagher didn’t lose his leg - he had an experience with a wounded soldier when he was a child which piqued his curiosity about the way the mind works.