<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Privacy Laws Apply to Bipolar Disorder?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/</link>
	<description>A blog on all things bipolar disorder (also known as manic depression)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-5543</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-5543</guid>
		<description>By the way I fotgot I wanted to address the horrible conditions in some hospitals, I totaly agree and I too have been in places that felt like One Flew Over the Cucoos Nest, but I beleive that is allowed and fueled by the shame and stigma that is still attached to mental health labels. There is by the goverment still a number of lifetime days for care, nowhere under medicare do they penalize those who overfeed themselfs, have diabetes II brought on solely by lack of excersise and diet. Yet they clog the ERs with preventful illness while those of us with a chemical embalence are blamed for our illness and serverely limited in ability to find good and afordable care. I do not use the term mental illness because I strongly object to being labeled an illness, I&#039;m not an illness. I have a chemical imbalence. As for those who do not listen to their Dr.s on weight issues and colesteral, smoking, and blood presure, I agree they should also be forced to a locked unit until they learn to take care of themselfs. They cost the overburdened health care system and the rest of us untold $$$ and money that would be there for a better health care system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way I fotgot I wanted to address the horrible conditions in some hospitals, I totaly agree and I too have been in places that felt like One Flew Over the Cucoos Nest, but I beleive that is allowed and fueled by the shame and stigma that is still attached to mental health labels. There is by the goverment still a number of lifetime days for care, nowhere under medicare do they penalize those who overfeed themselfs, have diabetes II brought on solely by lack of excersise and diet. Yet they clog the ERs with preventful illness while those of us with a chemical embalence are blamed for our illness and serverely limited in ability to find good and afordable care. I do not use the term mental illness because I strongly object to being labeled an illness, I&#8217;m not an illness. I have a chemical imbalence. As for those who do not listen to their Dr.s on weight issues and colesteral, smoking, and blood presure, I agree they should also be forced to a locked unit until they learn to take care of themselfs. They cost the overburdened health care system and the rest of us untold $$$ and money that would be there for a better health care system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-5542</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 23:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-5542</guid>
		<description>Absolutly privacy apply to all people. This comes under health care. There is not a seperation of the brain and body, its all conected, and all portected under the rights to health care privacy! What surprises me is that no one has brought up PAD&#039;s Psyhatric Advance Directives. As someone who has PTSD and bipolor II, I can legaly protect myself by making out a directive that tells what hospitals I will go to, Whats drugs I will accept and who the people are that will make any decisions for me. These people know which drugs I react strongly to nd which work. A PAD can help keep you from being heavily medicated, having shock treatment, and/or restrained. To make it a legal document it needs to be noterized and the people you put down must agree ahead of time and know your desires. Some states have their own versions but its best to make a longer one that explains why you do not want certain medications or combianions. Mine encludes directions on how to aproch me so my PTSD does not become triggered by many people coming at me with the intent to restrict my movments. Instead one person who can talk to me calmly works far better. 
    In my experance the most danger to anyone with a psyratric problem is psychratrist who, do not listen but prescribe meds on top of meds, and the media who continue to spread only the negitive outcomes. They don&#039;t seem to be interested in telling how a person lost the abilty to go to treatment becouse of buget cuts. the lies and shame are huge problem like one comment here where the boyfriend lied and said she was bipolor and out of control, sudenly anything she said was suspect! Its fear and ignorance by police and Drs who keep this happening. Yes Dr&#039;s, try going to the ER for a psyical problem and you will not be taken seriously becouse of a label, no matter how coherent you are. It is my beleife that those of us with ant mental health label need better privacy and protection form the ignorance of those who beleive the stories from the media. An example would be the man from Vergina Tech who shot all those people, not one story was about why he never got treatment though he had been refured, more than once. The wait to get in to many places is outraages, and the lack of insureance that will let good Dr.s see a client long enough, and get paied has taken even more psychatrist out of the game and they become private pay only! So you tell me how a student is suposed to get help, when everyone around him has dropped the ball and no one followed up. People did fear that man there was every indication that he could have been put on a hold and none of that would have happened. That may sound contry to privacy but in this case I&#039;m talking about someone who&#039;s behavor was scareing people and a 48-72 hour hold would have helped get treatment and it would have been no ones busness what medications or labels he would have gotten. But he would have gotten help(hopefully), but with anything psychrratic everyone backs off, the number of places to go is limited, coveage is limited and that is a result of the fear and stigma which cripples good and decent care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutly privacy apply to all people. This comes under health care. There is not a seperation of the brain and body, its all conected, and all portected under the rights to health care privacy! What surprises me is that no one has brought up PAD&#8217;s Psyhatric Advance Directives. As someone who has PTSD and bipolor II, I can legaly protect myself by making out a directive that tells what hospitals I will go to, Whats drugs I will accept and who the people are that will make any decisions for me. These people know which drugs I react strongly to nd which work. A PAD can help keep you from being heavily medicated, having shock treatment, and/or restrained. To make it a legal document it needs to be noterized and the people you put down must agree ahead of time and know your desires. Some states have their own versions but its best to make a longer one that explains why you do not want certain medications or combianions. Mine encludes directions on how to aproch me so my PTSD does not become triggered by many people coming at me with the intent to restrict my movments. Instead one person who can talk to me calmly works far better.<br />
    In my experance the most danger to anyone with a psyratric problem is psychratrist who, do not listen but prescribe meds on top of meds, and the media who continue to spread only the negitive outcomes. They don&#8217;t seem to be interested in telling how a person lost the abilty to go to treatment becouse of buget cuts. the lies and shame are huge problem like one comment here where the boyfriend lied and said she was bipolor and out of control, sudenly anything she said was suspect! Its fear and ignorance by police and Drs who keep this happening. Yes Dr&#8217;s, try going to the ER for a psyical problem and you will not be taken seriously becouse of a label, no matter how coherent you are. It is my beleife that those of us with ant mental health label need better privacy and protection form the ignorance of those who beleive the stories from the media. An example would be the man from Vergina Tech who shot all those people, not one story was about why he never got treatment though he had been refured, more than once. The wait to get in to many places is outraages, and the lack of insureance that will let good Dr.s see a client long enough, and get paied has taken even more psychatrist out of the game and they become private pay only! So you tell me how a student is suposed to get help, when everyone around him has dropped the ball and no one followed up. People did fear that man there was every indication that he could have been put on a hold and none of that would have happened. That may sound contry to privacy but in this case I&#8217;m talking about someone who&#8217;s behavor was scareing people and a 48-72 hour hold would have helped get treatment and it would have been no ones busness what medications or labels he would have gotten. But he would have gotten help(hopefully), but with anything psychrratic everyone backs off, the number of places to go is limited, coveage is limited and that is a result of the fear and stigma which cripples good and decent care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>I am APPALLED that this question would even be asked seriously. Not surprised, though. Having been bipolar II and experienced how other people react to that knowledge has shown me that people really don&#039;t consider mentally ill people &quot;people&quot; in the usual sense of the word. 

Being bipolar II I do not have the episodes that some of you have described with your families that cause you so much trouble, and am usually just very depressed, or irritable and annoying, but even so I have still experienced being stripped of my rights purely because of my diagnosis. 

A couple of years ago my fiance was being abusive, verbally and physically. At one point he hit me in the face twice and said he was leaving me. I panicked and went outside and put my car blocking his car in and tried desperately to talk to him, so he called the police, told them I had hit HIM, and that I was bipolar and was going to kill myself.

I assured the police and the ambulance that I was fine, and told them what happened, but because I was upset and he&#039;d told them I was bipolar they ignored everything I said and took me to the hospital. They hospital didn&#039;t have a psych unit, or a psychiatrist on staff at night, so they held me for about 8 hours waiting to transfer me to a psych hospital, and ran all kinds of blood tests. When I tried to refuse the tests they said if I refused them or refused to take off my clothes and give them my property they would call security, forcibly do all of it, record that I wouldn&#039;t do it voluntarily, and I&#039;d automatically be put on a 36 hour hold at the psych hospital based on regulations. 

They wouldn&#039;t listen to me, or talk to me, and just took all my clothes and phone and money and had someone in my room watching me. Eventually I got them to give my cell-phone back, and I persuaded my fiance to come and tell them he had been lying, and he did, and they said it was too late, and they couldn&#039;t let me go now without a psychiatrist evaluation, and they didn&#039;t have a psychiatrist.

Eventually I got transferred to the local psych hospital, and they evaluated me and let me go right away because I was clearly not in need of care. 

&quot;Great, so what&#039;s the problem?&quot; you say? The problem is that even though I refused to sign any of the paperwork and wrote on everything that I refused treatment and was not ill, I got billed for everything. Ambulance x2, tests, ER visit, doctor, SO much money. And I had no health insurance, and I have no family because my parents were physically and sexually abusive and I have no contact with them. My credit is ruined; I can&#039;t move because my credit score is bad and no apartment complex will take me even though I have excellent references. I can&#039;t get a new used car. I can&#039;t get a loan or a credit card. And I STILL owe a ton of money to the hospital and doctor. 

The result of it all was that, while I wasn&#039;t suicidal before this episode, I became so afterwards, and did not and never will tell a doctor or a friend or anyone else because I don&#039;t want this to happen again. Since then I lie to everyone about how I&#039;m doing, and don&#039;t talk to my doctor honestly, and am not getting adequate care because of that. But I would be better off dead than in debt and locked up. I&#039;ve been in the psych hospital once, when I was suicidal years ago, and it&#039;s the worst experience of my life. If I thought anything would cause me to get put back in there I would kill myself first. I got no therapy in there, got almost no food that I could eat (I&#039;m vegetarian and have food allergies) other than bread, AND they wouldn&#039;t let me have my asthma inhaler so I nearly died one night when I had an attack and couldn&#039;t get to the nurses&#039; station. 

My life and finances have been seriously damaged by people listening to someone who wasn&#039;t even a relative about my mental health. The fact that this can happen to me just because my fiance was angry with me is INSANE, and allowing other people rights over mentally ill people&#039;s lives and decisions would just make it easier for things like this to happen. And believe me, this kind of thing is NOT uncommon. 

I appreciate that having a mentally ill person in your life is hard. However, I guarantee that actually BEING mentally ill is harder still, not least because people are always trying to take our rights away, and assume that just because we have bipolar disorder we must be irrational, psychotic, impaired, liars, untrustworthy, dangerous, ad infinitum. 

Sometimes we get psychotic, sure, although I never have been. But a lot of mentally ill people function perfectly normally most of the time, and restricting their freedoms to protect yourselves is selfish and unethical. It makes more sense to set up your finances and legal assets so that some protection is built in for when they are psychotic. This can be extremely complicated if you&#039;re married to them, certainly. But the onus is on YOU, not them. You can make choices, according to you much better than they can, so make them. If you can&#039;t handle them, leave. I would rather my husband divorce me than that I live under his control and his whim and his mood just so he can feel safe in case I get manic. There&#039;s nothing Christian about subjugating someone else just to make yourself feel safe. 

But it seems clear that the issue rests more with the system not doing enough to recognize the gaps in care for seriously ill psychiatric patients and come up with solutions. Those solutions shouldn&#039;t be to resolve the issue by stripping mentally ill people of their rights. Develop legal and financial and medical safeguards for families of ill people, but don&#039;t give them autonomy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am APPALLED that this question would even be asked seriously. Not surprised, though. Having been bipolar II and experienced how other people react to that knowledge has shown me that people really don&#8217;t consider mentally ill people &#8220;people&#8221; in the usual sense of the word. </p>
<p>Being bipolar II I do not have the episodes that some of you have described with your families that cause you so much trouble, and am usually just very depressed, or irritable and annoying, but even so I have still experienced being stripped of my rights purely because of my diagnosis. </p>
<p>A couple of years ago my fiance was being abusive, verbally and physically. At one point he hit me in the face twice and said he was leaving me. I panicked and went outside and put my car blocking his car in and tried desperately to talk to him, so he called the police, told them I had hit HIM, and that I was bipolar and was going to kill myself.</p>
<p>I assured the police and the ambulance that I was fine, and told them what happened, but because I was upset and he&#8217;d told them I was bipolar they ignored everything I said and took me to the hospital. They hospital didn&#8217;t have a psych unit, or a psychiatrist on staff at night, so they held me for about 8 hours waiting to transfer me to a psych hospital, and ran all kinds of blood tests. When I tried to refuse the tests they said if I refused them or refused to take off my clothes and give them my property they would call security, forcibly do all of it, record that I wouldn&#8217;t do it voluntarily, and I&#8217;d automatically be put on a 36 hour hold at the psych hospital based on regulations. </p>
<p>They wouldn&#8217;t listen to me, or talk to me, and just took all my clothes and phone and money and had someone in my room watching me. Eventually I got them to give my cell-phone back, and I persuaded my fiance to come and tell them he had been lying, and he did, and they said it was too late, and they couldn&#8217;t let me go now without a psychiatrist evaluation, and they didn&#8217;t have a psychiatrist.</p>
<p>Eventually I got transferred to the local psych hospital, and they evaluated me and let me go right away because I was clearly not in need of care. </p>
<p>&#8220;Great, so what&#8217;s the problem?&#8221; you say? The problem is that even though I refused to sign any of the paperwork and wrote on everything that I refused treatment and was not ill, I got billed for everything. Ambulance x2, tests, ER visit, doctor, SO much money. And I had no health insurance, and I have no family because my parents were physically and sexually abusive and I have no contact with them. My credit is ruined; I can&#8217;t move because my credit score is bad and no apartment complex will take me even though I have excellent references. I can&#8217;t get a new used car. I can&#8217;t get a loan or a credit card. And I STILL owe a ton of money to the hospital and doctor. </p>
<p>The result of it all was that, while I wasn&#8217;t suicidal before this episode, I became so afterwards, and did not and never will tell a doctor or a friend or anyone else because I don&#8217;t want this to happen again. Since then I lie to everyone about how I&#8217;m doing, and don&#8217;t talk to my doctor honestly, and am not getting adequate care because of that. But I would be better off dead than in debt and locked up. I&#8217;ve been in the psych hospital once, when I was suicidal years ago, and it&#8217;s the worst experience of my life. If I thought anything would cause me to get put back in there I would kill myself first. I got no therapy in there, got almost no food that I could eat (I&#8217;m vegetarian and have food allergies) other than bread, AND they wouldn&#8217;t let me have my asthma inhaler so I nearly died one night when I had an attack and couldn&#8217;t get to the nurses&#8217; station. </p>
<p>My life and finances have been seriously damaged by people listening to someone who wasn&#8217;t even a relative about my mental health. The fact that this can happen to me just because my fiance was angry with me is INSANE, and allowing other people rights over mentally ill people&#8217;s lives and decisions would just make it easier for things like this to happen. And believe me, this kind of thing is NOT uncommon. </p>
<p>I appreciate that having a mentally ill person in your life is hard. However, I guarantee that actually BEING mentally ill is harder still, not least because people are always trying to take our rights away, and assume that just because we have bipolar disorder we must be irrational, psychotic, impaired, liars, untrustworthy, dangerous, ad infinitum. </p>
<p>Sometimes we get psychotic, sure, although I never have been. But a lot of mentally ill people function perfectly normally most of the time, and restricting their freedoms to protect yourselves is selfish and unethical. It makes more sense to set up your finances and legal assets so that some protection is built in for when they are psychotic. This can be extremely complicated if you&#8217;re married to them, certainly. But the onus is on YOU, not them. You can make choices, according to you much better than they can, so make them. If you can&#8217;t handle them, leave. I would rather my husband divorce me than that I live under his control and his whim and his mood just so he can feel safe in case I get manic. There&#8217;s nothing Christian about subjugating someone else just to make yourself feel safe. </p>
<p>But it seems clear that the issue rests more with the system not doing enough to recognize the gaps in care for seriously ill psychiatric patients and come up with solutions. Those solutions shouldn&#8217;t be to resolve the issue by stripping mentally ill people of their rights. Develop legal and financial and medical safeguards for families of ill people, but don&#8217;t give them autonomy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timmy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator>timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 02:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4799</guid>
		<description>Thomasena, Are you sure you have never hurt yourself or others? That is quite a high order for anyone. i have just noticed with my wife that the convenient truth is the sought after truth. In order to progress in a &quot;SUSTAINABLE&quot; way we need to sometimes hear the inconvenient truth. My observance as a supportive husband that has not been involved in any way with my wifes recovery (we are separated) is that she went shopping for the easy truth.

  We all need guidance,coaching and help within the human condition. When you watch someone dismantle 10 to 15 years of possitive growth and not listen to the advice that requires hard work and perseverence it is time for a wiser and more respected person to not strip rights away but to begin the questioning and behavior that leads to sustainable growth. My wife openly admits to being an &quot; I can&#039;t&quot; person. She also says that she is selfish. If someone openly accepts that they are the BP and that they are not open to working hard at a relationship in my opinion it is time for someone outside the BP to add some insight and forthought. These are the 2 things I have found lacking in the logic of my wife.

       The box is very large with BP so sometimes it is good to have someone be able to act strongly on your behalf so you can first understand where the box begins and ends(reality/fantasy) and also how to think outside the box in healthy ways.

                    just some thoughts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomasena, Are you sure you have never hurt yourself or others? That is quite a high order for anyone. i have just noticed with my wife that the convenient truth is the sought after truth. In order to progress in a &#8220;SUSTAINABLE&#8221; way we need to sometimes hear the inconvenient truth. My observance as a supportive husband that has not been involved in any way with my wifes recovery (we are separated) is that she went shopping for the easy truth.</p>
<p>  We all need guidance,coaching and help within the human condition. When you watch someone dismantle 10 to 15 years of possitive growth and not listen to the advice that requires hard work and perseverence it is time for a wiser and more respected person to not strip rights away but to begin the questioning and behavior that leads to sustainable growth. My wife openly admits to being an &#8221; I can&#8217;t&#8221; person. She also says that she is selfish. If someone openly accepts that they are the BP and that they are not open to working hard at a relationship in my opinion it is time for someone outside the BP to add some insight and forthought. These are the 2 things I have found lacking in the logic of my wife.</p>
<p>       The box is very large with BP so sometimes it is good to have someone be able to act strongly on your behalf so you can first understand where the box begins and ends(reality/fantasy) and also how to think outside the box in healthy ways.</p>
<p>                    just some thoughts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomasena</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4657</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomasena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4657</guid>
		<description>As someone who has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, I have no problem with my loved ones being involved or informed of my progress or issues as long as I chose who will be privy to the information.  I think if people wait until someone is cycling or in the midst of a manic or depressive episode, it is too late.  While the person is lucid and well, discuss the issue in a non-blaming and respectful manner.  Likening an adult with bipolar to a 7 year old child is disrespectful and if this person referred to me in that manner and then wanted to be involved in my treatment, I would exclude them as well.  People with mental illness are not necessarily out of control and unable to make decisions.  I have never committed a crime, hurt myself or anyone else and do not think that my right to privacy should be impeded because I carry the diagnosis of bipolar disorder.  Painting a group of people who share a trait (in this case a diagnosis) with the same brush is a dangerous and slippery slope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone who has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, I have no problem with my loved ones being involved or informed of my progress or issues as long as I chose who will be privy to the information.  I think if people wait until someone is cycling or in the midst of a manic or depressive episode, it is too late.  While the person is lucid and well, discuss the issue in a non-blaming and respectful manner.  Likening an adult with bipolar to a 7 year old child is disrespectful and if this person referred to me in that manner and then wanted to be involved in my treatment, I would exclude them as well.  People with mental illness are not necessarily out of control and unable to make decisions.  I have never committed a crime, hurt myself or anyone else and do not think that my right to privacy should be impeded because I carry the diagnosis of bipolar disorder.  Painting a group of people who share a trait (in this case a diagnosis) with the same brush is a dangerous and slippery slope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ecoli</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4632</link>
		<dc:creator>ecoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4632</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes Venus, it&#039;s ok for people to destroy themselves as long as they do it slowly and in socially acceptable ways.  Hypertensive? Stroke units are full of folks who were noncompliant with their blood pressure meds or kept smoking and kept eating fatty foods and didn&#039;t exercise and so on.  If the number one priority is saving people, then we better start rounding up half of America and force them to take their meds.  Imagine how many non-compliant hypertensive people could be saved!  

When I was inpatient I found it interesting that they were so concerned about the chance I might be a danger to myself, and yet I was surrounded by staff who already were a danger to themselves.  One nurse I&#039;m thinking of was morbidly obese, smoked like a chimney, rarely got out of his chair, and ate quite possibly the largest amount of pizza I&#039;ve ever seen a person consume.  And even though heart disease is the leading cause of death, nobody said hey that nurse lacks insight we better force him into an exercise group and make him take his insulin.  Clearly, he lacked insight or he wouldn&#039;t have been so self destructive. 

So, that&#039;s how I come to the conclusion that forced treatment should only be used in the case of a person being a danger to others or if they&#039;re not oriented X 3.  However, the point at which patients become oriented is the point at which they must be allowed to make their own decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes Venus, it&#8217;s ok for people to destroy themselves as long as they do it slowly and in socially acceptable ways.  Hypertensive? Stroke units are full of folks who were noncompliant with their blood pressure meds or kept smoking and kept eating fatty foods and didn&#8217;t exercise and so on.  If the number one priority is saving people, then we better start rounding up half of America and force them to take their meds.  Imagine how many non-compliant hypertensive people could be saved!  </p>
<p>When I was inpatient I found it interesting that they were so concerned about the chance I might be a danger to myself, and yet I was surrounded by staff who already were a danger to themselves.  One nurse I&#8217;m thinking of was morbidly obese, smoked like a chimney, rarely got out of his chair, and ate quite possibly the largest amount of pizza I&#8217;ve ever seen a person consume.  And even though heart disease is the leading cause of death, nobody said hey that nurse lacks insight we better force him into an exercise group and make him take his insulin.  Clearly, he lacked insight or he wouldn&#8217;t have been so self destructive. </p>
<p>So, that&#8217;s how I come to the conclusion that forced treatment should only be used in the case of a person being a danger to others or if they&#8217;re not oriented X 3.  However, the point at which patients become oriented is the point at which they must be allowed to make their own decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VenusH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4625</link>
		<dc:creator>VenusH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4625</guid>
		<description>you are right, shinghella. In Zamjatin&#039;s novel &quot;WE&quot; (MY) harming yourself was not allowed... because no machine or robot would harm themselves. Therefore alcohol and cigerates and everything unhealthy (including too much of sex) was banned. 

Now even people without mental illness label are danger to themselves. They have high cholesterol yet they eat bacon and fries like there is not tomorrow. They are diabetics and nom on candies galore. People who just undergone knee surgery sometimes go on trip abroad in third world country where they be on the feet all day. They drink. Have unprotected sex. Go on low-carb diets and other diets that are harmfull to their bodies. In  the end, many of these will end up dead or severly harmed - because of their behavior. Yet, nobody tries to intervene. How is it different from person with label who decides - when stable - that they DO NOT WANT to be &quot;treated&quot; because they feel more harm than good is done? Often the treatment is the problem. Contemporary doctors just give you a script. Here&#039;s a drug for the problem. Side effect? There&#039;s a pill for it. And this one is to lessen the side effect of the drug prescribed to treat the side effects of the first drug. 

If one is trustful of their family, they should be able to sign a paper that allows the family to intervene. If not... well, their choice, their consequences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are right, shinghella. In Zamjatin&#8217;s novel &#8220;WE&#8221; (MY) harming yourself was not allowed&#8230; because no machine or robot would harm themselves. Therefore alcohol and cigerates and everything unhealthy (including too much of sex) was banned. </p>
<p>Now even people without mental illness label are danger to themselves. They have high cholesterol yet they eat bacon and fries like there is not tomorrow. They are diabetics and nom on candies galore. People who just undergone knee surgery sometimes go on trip abroad in third world country where they be on the feet all day. They drink. Have unprotected sex. Go on low-carb diets and other diets that are harmfull to their bodies. In  the end, many of these will end up dead or severly harmed &#8211; because of their behavior. Yet, nobody tries to intervene. How is it different from person with label who decides &#8211; when stable &#8211; that they DO NOT WANT to be &#8220;treated&#8221; because they feel more harm than good is done? Often the treatment is the problem. Contemporary doctors just give you a script. Here&#8217;s a drug for the problem. Side effect? There&#8217;s a pill for it. And this one is to lessen the side effect of the drug prescribed to treat the side effects of the first drug. </p>
<p>If one is trustful of their family, they should be able to sign a paper that allows the family to intervene. If not&#8230; well, their choice, their consequences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shigella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>shigella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 23:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>I need to pick a name, so today I&#039;ll be shigella.  Anyway, Miastella, I agree with you on one thing. The MH field is broken.  The abuses you talk about that occurred inpatient in the 1970s are still going on.  I know, I&#039;ve seen it.  In many of these institutions they routinely deprive people of things like fresh and sunlight, or they use it as a threat to gain compliance.  Can you imagine having to earn the right to breathe some fresh air?  I can, because I had to earn it.  Can you imagine being treat like a criminal when you have committed no crime?  Talk about inhumane. What sort of a message do they think that sends to patients? 

One thing that&#039;s interesting in this discussion (not directed at miastella but just in general) is that those who are so pro-forced treatment completely ignore the issue of abuse.  It&#039;s almost as if they think it doesn&#039;t happen. In this overzealousness to forcibly treat, how do you protect people like me who realize that it is the treatment that is making them worse and want out?  Had I not had the right to leave, I would still be cycling in and out of the psych ward, drugged up and nonfunctional.  That&#039;s not a life to me.  So, how do you ensure that people who are getting worse with treatment can get out if you leave it up to mental health professionals and/or family?  And how do you protect patients from family members like Rebecca Riley&#039;s mom?  They are lots of messed up families out there and we have to be very careful about who we give the power over other peoples&#039; lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need to pick a name, so today I&#8217;ll be shigella.  Anyway, Miastella, I agree with you on one thing. The MH field is broken.  The abuses you talk about that occurred inpatient in the 1970s are still going on.  I know, I&#8217;ve seen it.  In many of these institutions they routinely deprive people of things like fresh and sunlight, or they use it as a threat to gain compliance.  Can you imagine having to earn the right to breathe some fresh air?  I can, because I had to earn it.  Can you imagine being treat like a criminal when you have committed no crime?  Talk about inhumane. What sort of a message do they think that sends to patients? </p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s interesting in this discussion (not directed at miastella but just in general) is that those who are so pro-forced treatment completely ignore the issue of abuse.  It&#8217;s almost as if they think it doesn&#8217;t happen. In this overzealousness to forcibly treat, how do you protect people like me who realize that it is the treatment that is making them worse and want out?  Had I not had the right to leave, I would still be cycling in and out of the psych ward, drugged up and nonfunctional.  That&#8217;s not a life to me.  So, how do you ensure that people who are getting worse with treatment can get out if you leave it up to mental health professionals and/or family?  And how do you protect patients from family members like Rebecca Riley&#8217;s mom?  They are lots of messed up families out there and we have to be very careful about who we give the power over other peoples&#8217; lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4602</guid>
		<description>Sunflower, I&#039;m not generalizing.  That&#039;s why I use the word &quot;sometimes.&quot;  I think perhaps you&#039;re looking for stuff that&#039;s not there.  If you notice, I didn&#039;t write &quot;always.&quot;  I understand there are loving families.  I have a loving family myself.  Please don&#039;t put words in my mouth that I didn&#039;t say.  If your son wants you involved, he can sign papers to make sure you are.  Why don&#039;t you ask him to to sign the paperwork when he is not delusional and doing well so you will have some say so when he&#039;s not?  If he doesn&#039;t want to sign when he&#039;s not delusional and doing well then perhaps you should find out why.

Also, I meant in my previous post to write people who are NOT oriented X 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunflower, I&#8217;m not generalizing.  That&#8217;s why I use the word &#8220;sometimes.&#8221;  I think perhaps you&#8217;re looking for stuff that&#8217;s not there.  If you notice, I didn&#8217;t write &#8220;always.&#8221;  I understand there are loving families.  I have a loving family myself.  Please don&#8217;t put words in my mouth that I didn&#8217;t say.  If your son wants you involved, he can sign papers to make sure you are.  Why don&#8217;t you ask him to to sign the paperwork when he is not delusional and doing well so you will have some say so when he&#8217;s not?  If he doesn&#8217;t want to sign when he&#8217;s not delusional and doing well then perhaps you should find out why.</p>
<p>Also, I meant in my previous post to write people who are NOT oriented X 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miastella</title>
		<link>http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/2009/11/should-privacy-laws-apply-to-bipolar-disorder/comment-page-3/#comment-4601</link>
		<dc:creator>Miastella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 23:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.psychcentral.com/bipolar/?p=440#comment-4601</guid>
		<description>Much of the total problem started in the 1970&#039;s with deinstitutionalization. It was done for good reason; there was a great deal of abuse and benign neglect of the mentally ill. Patient&#039;s were locked up and left in hospitals for endless stays.Families were totally in charge. Famous cases like Fannie Farmer stigmatized mental health care. From there, laws were put in place that seriously affect what both families and mental health workers can do. This becomes a legal issue and an advocacy issue.  I&#039;m in the Mh field and I&#039;ve seen families and significant others suffer a great deal. My hands are tied. The mh field is very broken. We need to find a way to get together and fight. Why do we let disabled people, whether temporarily or permanently, loose to hurt themselves or others? This isn&#039;t humane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of the total problem started in the 1970&#8242;s with deinstitutionalization. It was done for good reason; there was a great deal of abuse and benign neglect of the mentally ill. Patient&#8217;s were locked up and left in hospitals for endless stays.Families were totally in charge. Famous cases like Fannie Farmer stigmatized mental health care. From there, laws were put in place that seriously affect what both families and mental health workers can do. This becomes a legal issue and an advocacy issue.  I&#8217;m in the Mh field and I&#8217;ve seen families and significant others suffer a great deal. My hands are tied. The mh field is very broken. We need to find a way to get together and fight. Why do we let disabled people, whether temporarily or permanently, loose to hurt themselves or others? This isn&#8217;t humane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

