The New York Times recently reported about an ongoing study on aging that began in 1981 and has included at least 14,000 people all over the age of 65. At least 1,000 members of the group were older than 90. The study, conducted by the University of California, is looking at what provides protection against dementia in some groups of elderly people. Like other studies, this one points to keeping mentally and socially active as variables that seem present in most people who stay sharp in old age. Many of the people who kept their mental sharpness played cards daily.

I witnessed these interactions of factors such as social support, and the benefit of keeping mentally busy, first hand over the past decade. When my father passed away 10 years ago, my mother moved to an active retirement community. She was in relatively good health. At 81, my mother enthusiastically enjoyed the various social activities; she joined clubs, got regular exercise, organized events, and helped to arrange expeditions to restaurants, concerts, and even an occasional road trip. Those first few years at the community, she occasionally played cards.

However, as she aged her outside activities began to decrease; she became frail, and she filled more of her time with card playing. There were two tables, mostly women, who met on the balcony at the center. The game was canasta. It was a serious game; played for the glory of winning or sometimes a few pennies. If a visitor dared to interrupt the play, the reaction of the group was quick and simple. Go away–we’re busy. I’d often just say hello, check to see if she needed anything and quietly leave, grateful that she was occupied.

Sometimes a player would vanish. A few never returned; others came back for a while. If you asked those at the table what happened, there would be comments such as, “Oh, he died,” or “She went to live with her daughter,” or “He’s in the hospital,” or “She had to go to the nursing home,” “She fell,” or “She’s not doing well today.”

Other players were auditioned to replace someone who left. Those who passed muster were admitted to the group. As the years went on, two tables became one. My mother was a sharp player and often won. She played almost daily for many years.

Then, she started to make mistakes at the card table, forgetting her turn or not able to follow the sequence. She became weaker and the tremors in her hands caused her to spill her cards, face up, for all to see. She spent more time in her room, crocheting crooked baby blankets. She talked about losing interest in cards and complained that some of the ladies were annoyed with her. But, she kept playing once in a while until one day she simply stopped. “I’ve had enough,” she stated. A few months later she died.

Did the card playing help keep her sharp? Or did she play cards because she was sharp? Did card playing keep her going because of the social support it provided her? How did she know when to stop? Did her group push her out with various subtle cues? Support groups such as these must face a terrible dilemma when one of their members can’t participate.

Studies such as the one conducted by the University of California can’t really answer these questions. Rather, they give us tantalizing hints about what may contribute to successful aging. One has to wonder what can be done to ease the transition from the card table to the end of the game.

Comments

This post currently has 7 comments/trackbacks.
You can read the comments or leave your own thoughts.

Trackbacks

Prof.Lakshman (May 26, 2009)

From Psych Central's website:
PsychCentral (May 26, 2009)

    Last reviewed: 26 May 2009