I never finish reading Peter Kramer’s book Should You Leave?
It’s so full of insights and provocative ideas, I keep picking it up and looking at sections again and again.
Here’s a paragraph that fascinates me:
It often seems that I could fill a practice with cases of falling out of love, so common is the complaint. The usual scenario is this: A young couple is well into the phase of family formation – though it is only from a distance that the family formation appears long-standing. The two have recently had their second child, and to one spouse – it could be either, but I shall choose the husband – this state represents the start of family life.
Until that point, the husband experienced himself as single, a wife and first child being elegant accoutrements to psychological bachelorhood.
With the birth of the second child, he discovers that he is permanently a husband and father. And then one day he comes home and announces he is out of love and leaving forever. (p 161)
I’m especially fixated on Kramer’s term, psychological bachelorhood.
I spoke in a recent post about how, although I am an independent and self-sufficient person, I feel like I am half of a couple.
What’s the difference between the two conditions?
I believe that being psychologically married involves
Scary!
Yet, isn’t every worthwhile adventure a little bit scary?
photo of early spring growth, yet to blossom
From Psych Central's website:
PsychCentral (May 13, 2010)
From Psych Central's website:
PsychCentral (May 14, 2010)
From Psych Central's World of Psychology:
Best of Our Blogs: May 21, 2010 | World of Psychology (May 14, 2010)
Last reviewed: 13 May 2010